It's Time to Criticize Windows 10
The Evolving Landscape of Windows 10
Windows 10 represents a significant progression in operating system development. However, it’s also reasonable to question whether certain aspects represent a regression from previous iterations.
Currently available as a technical preview, Windows 10 is still under development. This ongoing process provides a valuable chance for users to contribute to the shaping of the final product.
Similarities to Previous Versions
In many respects, Windows 10 can be viewed as an evolution of Windows 8, notably with the reintroduction of a Start Menu. Furthermore, the windowed presentation of "Modern" applications is achievable through existing third-party software like ModernMix.
The newly integrated Virtual Desktops functionality also mirrors capabilities already available via alternative software solutions.
Addressing the Legacy of Windows 8
The development of Windows 10 is largely a response to the negative reception of Windows 8. The changes imposed on experienced users proved disruptive, leading many to consider alternative operating systems after decades of Windows usage.
The Importance of User Feedback
Given that Windows 10 is currently in preview, it’s crucial to actively provide feedback to Microsoft. The purpose of a preview program is to solicit and incorporate user input.
Why is there a tendency among some technology enthusiasts to advocate for patience and defer judgment until the final release? Active participation and constructive criticism are essential during this preview phase.
Providing feedback is the core benefit of participating in the technical preview program.
The Questionable Reliability of Microsoft's "Fixes" in Preview Versions
Frequently, when concerns regarding Windows 10 are voiced, a common response from detractors is that it’s merely a technical preview and Microsoft will address these issues in the final release. However, considering the company’s past actions, such an assumption appears unfounded.
A History of Disregarding User Feedback
It’s worthwhile to revisit some recent instances where Microsoft seemingly overlooked user preferences.
The Windows 8 Preview, for example, required a registry modification to bypass the Start Screen and directly access the desktop. Microsoft subsequently disabled this workaround in a later update. Despite clear user indications of a preference against booting to the Start Screen, initial feedback was ignored.
Fortunately, Microsoft eventually yielded to user demand and permitted desktop booting in Windows 8.1. However, by this point, considerable negative perception had already taken root.
Related: The Windows Store is a Cesspool of Scams -- Why Doesn't Microsoft Care?
Discontinued Programs and Unfulfilled Promises
The Technet program, which provided yearly access to Microsoft software for testing, was a valuable resource for system administrators, technical writers, and enthusiasts. Its eventual discontinuation caused frustration among power users.
The release of Windows RT, despite its inability to run standard desktop software – limiting users to "Modern" applications – also raises questions. Consumers who purchased Surface RT tablets discovered this limitation, and Microsoft ultimately ceased promoting Windows RT.
The Windows Store and Unaddressed Security Concerns
Numerous scam applications infiltrated the Windows Store, remaining active for extended periods. Despite reports from many users, Microsoft initially failed to address this problem.
It wasn't until a concerted effort to bring attention to the issue that Microsoft responded and initiated a cleanup. This demonstrates the effectiveness of public feedback.
Current Issues in Windows 10
Related: How to Hide the Search/Cortana Box and Task View Button on the Windows 10 Taskbar
Microsoft has integrated a non-removable Search button into the Windows 10 Taskbar. Clicking this button displays irrelevant content, such as celebrity news. A separate, functional local search is available within the Start Menu for apps and documents, but this new button primarily serves web searches.
The button is often slow, prone to freezing, and generally provides a subpar user experience. Therefore, the question arises: why should users expect Microsoft to offer an option to hide it?
Ongoing Usability Concerns
Beyond the Search button, Windows 10 presents other usability challenges. Modern applications lack proper resizing capabilities, and their controls feel awkward.
The continued existence of both PC Settings and Control Panel, with settings arbitrarily distributed between them, remains illogical. Settings frequently appear in a "Metro" style pop-out from the screen's side, even in the desktop version. The Task View button, while somewhat useful, also cannot be removed from the Taskbar.
The Urgent Need for Direct Feedback on Windows 10
A critical period for voicing concerns regarding Windows 10 has arrived. Failure to provide robust criticism could result in a repeat of the issues experienced with Windows 8.
Historically, insufficient public dissent and reliance on “official” feedback channels have proven ineffective, as demonstrated by the reception of Windows Vista. It is vital to learn from past experiences.
Direct and Unfiltered Communication is Key
Restraint in expressing dissatisfaction is no longer advisable. If a feature or design choice is deemed illogical, it should be explicitly stated as such.
The definition of “stupid” – “lacking intelligence or common sense” – is relevant here. Consider the recent integration of a non-removable taskbar button as a potential example of this.
Beyond Polite Discourse
This isn't a call for hostility towards Microsoft. However, given the company’s track record, ensuring that concerns are clearly articulated is paramount.
Worrying about the sensitivities of a large corporation should be secondary to advocating for a user-friendly operating system. The size of the entity does not necessitate deference.
Strong feedback is essential to shaping the future of Windows 10 and preventing the recurrence of past mistakes.
It’s time to be honest, public, and direct with Microsoft regarding the areas where Windows 10 falls short.
The Power of Public Opinion: Lessons from the Xbox One
Consider the initial plans for the Xbox One. Had feedback been limited to formal channels, the console likely would have launched with a mandatory, always-on internet connection.
Furthermore, stringent DRM restrictions would have hindered the ability to share or resell used games. The Kinect would have been a compulsory component as well.
However, a widespread public reaction, occurring even before the product’s release, compelled Microsoft to revise its approach. This change was directly influenced by vocal gamer opposition.
"You can play, share, lend, and resell your games exactly as you do today on Xbox 360."
The ability to utilize the Xbox One offline, even during internet outages, is a direct result of public complaints and even satirical commentary on television programs.
Similarly, the return of the Start Menu, after a period of absence, stemmed from user and tech journalist dissatisfaction with Windows 8’s usability.
There is potential for Windows 10 to achieve a level of excellence, blending the strengths of Windows 7 with the advancements of subsequent iterations. But open communication is essential to realizing this potential.
Why Public Feedback Matters
The Xbox One example demonstrates the significant impact of collective user voices. It highlights how public discourse can shape product development.
Microsoft actively listened to the concerns expressed by its customer base, ultimately leading to substantial changes in its initial plans.
- Always-on internet requirement was dropped.
- Restrictive DRM was removed.
- Kinect became optional.
These adjustments were not made in a vacuum; they were a direct response to the pressure exerted by the gaming community.
The Windows 8/10 Parallel
The situation with Windows 8 and the subsequent development of Windows 10 further illustrate this point. User feedback played a crucial role in the evolution of the operating system.
Many found the Windows 8 interface disruptive and challenging to navigate. This criticism prompted Microsoft to reconsider its design choices for Windows 10.
The willingness to address these concerns suggests a commitment to user-centric development, where public opinion is valued and incorporated into the product lifecycle.
Prioritize Official Channels for Providing Feedback
Related: Guidance on Submitting Feedback to Microsoft within the Windows 10 Technical Preview.
Expressing dissatisfaction with aspects of Windows 10 is perfectly acceptable, however, initiating the process by reporting issues directly to Microsoft is crucial. Despite past performance, it remains the duty of Windows Insiders utilizing a preview build to utilize the designated feedback system.
A greater volume of reported issues significantly increases the likelihood of Microsoft addressing them.
Do not hesitate to share your honest opinions. Microsoft, as a commercial entity, provides products to consumers. It is important to ensure they are delivering products aligned with customer preferences.
Vocal and frequent feedback is essential if you are invested in the future of Windows.
Why Official Feedback Matters
Using the official channels ensures your input is tracked and categorized effectively. This allows Microsoft to identify trends and prioritize improvements based on user reports.
Direct feedback also provides Microsoft with valuable diagnostic information, aiding in the resolution of underlying problems.
- Increased Visibility: Your feedback contributes to a larger dataset.
- Targeted Improvements: Helps Microsoft focus on the most pressing issues.
- Direct Impact: Offers a pathway for influencing product development.
Remember, participating in the Windows Insider Program comes with the responsibility of contributing to its improvement. Providing constructive criticism through the proper channels is a key component of this process.
