Cheap IPS Monitor: 3 Reasons to Avoid
The Evolution of IPS Monitor Technology
For a considerable period, In-Plane Switching (IPS) technology has been a leading force in the realm of computer monitors. It has consistently garnered acclaim for its ability to address several shortcomings commonly associated with more affordable TN (Twisted Nematic) panel monitors.
Initial Advantages of IPS
Initially, IPS panels were favored due to their superior color accuracy and wider viewing angles. These characteristics were a significant improvement over TN panels, which often suffered from color shifting when viewed off-axis.
The technology’s capacity to mitigate common problems in lower-cost displays made it a popular choice for professionals requiring precise color representation, such as graphic designers and photographers.
The Changing Landscape
However, the adoption of IPS technology into more budget-friendly monitor options has brought certain drawbacks into sharper focus. As IPS panels became more widespread, some of their inherent limitations were amplified.
Consequently, the choice of selecting an IPS monitor for a future purchase is now less straightforward than it once was. A careful evaluation of needs and alternatives is now essential.
Considerations for Modern Buyers
- Response Times: While improved, IPS panels can sometimes exhibit slower response times compared to TN panels, potentially leading to motion blur in fast-paced games.
- Cost: Although prices have decreased, IPS monitors generally remain more expensive than their TN counterparts.
- Black Levels: IPS panels traditionally struggle to achieve the same deep black levels as VA (Vertical Alignment) panels.
Therefore, the decision to invest in an IPS monitor should be based on a thorough understanding of its strengths and weaknesses in relation to specific usage scenarios.
Ghosting/Blurring
A frequently encountered issue with all types of LCD displays, ghosting or blurring manifests as an unwanted trail following moving objects on the screen. These two terms are, in essence, interchangeable descriptions of the same visual defect.
Understanding the Phenomenon
While potentially present in nearly all contemporary monitors and HDTVs, ghosting is more commonly observed on IPS panels. Premium displays typically mitigate this problem through superior panel quality and firmware-based blur reduction technologies.
The Impact of Cost
Lower-priced monitors often lack these advanced features, or implement them with reduced effectiveness. This is a recurring point in product reviews. Direct observation at an electronics store can also reveal the issue.
Individual perception of ghosting varies, making personal assessment advisable. It’s beneficial to evaluate the effect firsthand before making a purchase.
Variations Among IPS Monitors
The severity of ghosting isn't uniform across all budget IPS monitors. For instance, the LG Flatron IPS226V has been noted for its swift response times and minimal ghosting.
However, this monitor represents an exception to the rule. Numerous other models, even those from LG, have been identified as exhibiting moderate to significant ghosting.
Key Takeaways
- Ghosting and blurring are the same image defect.
- IPS panels are more prone to this issue.
- Higher-end displays often compensate for ghosting.
- Budget monitors may lack effective ghosting reduction.
- Personal evaluation is recommended.
The Illusion of Guaranteed Image Quality with IPS Panels
The perception that an IPS panel automatically equates to superior image quality is a common one among technology enthusiasts. However, this assumption isn't consistently accurate.
While it's true that IPS displays generally offer advantages over TN panels, such as a broader color spectrum and improved viewing angles, these benefits aren't the complete picture. Reliable performance beyond these two aspects cannot be assured.
Factors Influencing IPS Display Quality
The quality of the backlight, determined by the specific lighting components and their arrangement, plays a crucial role. Furthermore, color accuracy is affected by the screen's surface finish and the characteristics of the backlight itself.
It is in these finer details that lower-cost IPS displays, often produced by manufacturers like LG and ASUS, frequently demonstrate shortcomings.
Consider the LG Flatron D2342P as an illustrative example. Despite utilizing an IPS panel, its image quality doesn't surpass that of high-end TN monitors.
LG heavily promoted its new IPS monitors at CES 2011. Initial buyers, anticipating a superior product, were often disappointed to discover that it is possible to engineer an IPS display that performs worse than a TN alternative.
Therefore, simply possessing an IPS panel doesn't guarantee a premium visual experience.
Feature Deficiencies in Budget IPS Monitors
When a display aims for a price point between $200 and $300 while incorporating a costly panel, compromises are inevitable. These concessions frequently manifest as limitations in connectivity options or a reduction in overall build quality.
Consider the ASUS ML239H as a case in point. Available for approximately $189.99, it offers IPS technology, but lacks a DVI input, necessitating the use of an adapter.
Limited Adjustability and Connectivity
Furthermore, the ML239H provides only swivel and tilt adjustments. VESA mount compatibility is absent, and integrated speakers are not included.
Significant backlight bleed is also often observed. This issue directly relates to the overall quality of the display's construction.
Trade-offs in Functionality
It’s important to note that height adjustment is not typically found on lower-priced TN monitors either. However, at a similar price point, TN monitors commonly offer at least three video input options.
Built-in speakers are also a frequent inclusion in budget TN models. Therefore, prioritizing an IPS panel at a lower cost often means foregoing features that may prove more essential than anticipated.
Here's a summary of common sacrifices:
- Reduced video input options (like the absence of DVI).
- Limited ergonomic adjustments (no height adjustment, VESA mount).
- Lack of integrated speakers.
- Increased backlight bleed.
Ultimately, the pursuit of affordable IPS technology can result in a display that is lacking in crucial functionalities.
Final Thoughts
The arrival of affordable IPS monitors around 2011 initially sparked optimism regarding a potential shift in the budget display market. However, consumers frequently discovered that the lower price point correlated with compromised quality in areas beyond viewing angles.
A worthwhile investment in an IPS monitor means prioritizing quality from the outset. Considering the longevity of monitors – typically five years or more, and often exceeding a decade – and their resistance to rapid obsolescence, a higher upfront cost is often justified.
Rather than settling for a budget option, it is advisable to accumulate funds and purchase a premium, high-quality monitor. This approach will likely result in a more satisfying and durable user experience over the long term.
