LOGO

Lossless File Formats: Understanding & Avoiding Lossy to Lossless Conversion

November 6, 2015
Lossless File Formats: Understanding & Avoiding Lossy to Lossless Conversion

Understanding Media File Formats: Lossy vs. Lossless

When working with digital media – encompassing images, audio, and video – a fundamental understanding of file formats is crucial. Selecting the appropriate format directly impacts both file quality and size.

Employing an unsuitable format can lead to diminished quality or an inflated file size, hindering efficient storage and sharing.

Lossy and Lossless Compression Explained

Media file formats are broadly categorized as either "lossy" or "lossless." These classifications refer to how the files are compressed to reduce their size.

Let's delve into the distinctions between these two approaches, outlining the benefits of each and highlighting a critical rule regarding conversions.

Lossy compression permanently removes some data from the file to achieve smaller sizes. This data removal is designed to be imperceptible to the human eye or ear, but it does result in a degree of quality degradation.

Common examples of lossy formats include JPEG (images) and MP3 (audio). These formats prioritize smaller file sizes over absolute fidelity.

Lossless compression, conversely, reduces file size without discarding any data. It achieves this through sophisticated algorithms that identify and eliminate redundancies.

Formats like PNG (images) and FLAC (audio) fall into this category. They maintain the original quality of the media, albeit often at the expense of larger file sizes.

Why Avoid Converting Lossy to Lossless?

A key principle to remember is to never convert a lossy file format to a lossless one. This process cannot restore the data that was originally discarded during lossy compression.

Converting from lossy to lossless will only result in a larger file size without any improvement in quality. The lost information remains permanently absent.

It's always preferable to work with the highest quality original file possible. If you need to compress a file, start with a lossless format and convert it to lossy if necessary, rather than the other way around.

Consider these points when choosing a format: if file size is paramount and some quality loss is acceptable, a lossy format is suitable. If preserving every detail is essential, a lossless format is the better choice.

Understanding Data Compression

Data compression is employed to reduce file sizes, resulting in quicker download speeds and minimized storage requirements. Consider the process of capturing a photograph; a camera records extensive light information to construct the image. Saving this image in a RAW format preserves all the data captured by the sensor, potentially resulting in file sizes around 25 MB.

However, this size is dependent on the image's resolution – cameras with higher megapixel counts generate larger files. When sharing these files online, such as on social media or a website, these large file sizes become impractical.

A gallery filled with RAW images could easily consume hundreds of megabytes of storage. While RAW formats are valuable for professional photographers seeking maximum image quality during editing, they aren't typically necessary for everyday use.

Instead, cameras and smartphones commonly convert images to JPEG format. JPEG files are significantly smaller than their RAW counterparts. This conversion involves discarding some image data, facilitated by a compression algorithm optimized for photographs.

Despite the data reduction, JPEG compression aims to maintain acceptable visual quality, though compression artifacts may be visible depending on the chosen quality setting. It's important to note that lossy formats offer adjustable levels of compression.

For instance, JPEG allows users to control the quality setting; lower quality results in smaller file sizes but a corresponding decrease in image fidelity. The image below illustrates a highly compressed JPEG, showcasing noticeable "compression artifacts."

what-lossless-file-formats-are-why-you-shouldnt-convert-lossy-to-lossless-1.jpg

Lossy and Lossless File Formats Explained

The term "lossless" is applied to formats like RAW because they retain all original file information. Conversely, JPEG is categorized as a "lossy" format, as data is discarded during the conversion process. However, it’s important to note that lossy and lossless characteristics extend beyond these two formats.

  • Images: Lossless image formats include RAW, BMP, and PNG. JPEG and WebP, on the other hand, are examples of lossy image formats.
  • Audio: WAV is frequently used as a container for lossless audio, though it can also accommodate lossy audio. FLAC represents a lossless audio format, while MP3 is a lossy one.
  • Video: Truly lossless video formats are uncommon for typical consumers due to the resulting large file sizes. Popular formats such as H.264 and H.265 are inherently lossy.

Certain lossless formats also incorporate compression techniques. For instance, a WAV file often contains uncompressed audio, leading to substantial file sizes. A FLAC file can store the same lossless audio as a WAV file, but utilizes compression to reduce the file’s overall size.

Formats like FLAC maintain data integrity—no information is discarded—and employ intelligent compression, similar to how ZIP files function. Despite this, they remain considerably larger than MP3 files, which achieve smaller sizes by sacrificing data.

Related: When Is Lossless Audio Streaming Actually Worth It?

Even conversions between lossless formats can introduce data loss. A truly lossless conversion requires the original file’s data to be fully contained within the destination file. For example, FLAC files, in their lossless form, support audio up to 24-bit depth.

Converting a WAV file with 32-bit PCM audio to FLAC would necessitate discarding data. However, a conversion from a 24-bit PCM WAV file to FLAC would be entirely lossless.

The image below demonstrates the impact of lossy compression. The lower version of the photograph utilizes a low-quality lossy compression algorithm. Consequently, its file size is significantly smaller than the image above.

what-lossless-file-formats-are-why-you-shouldnt-convert-lossy-to-lossless-2.jpg

Image sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

The Detrimental Practice of Converting Lossy to Lossless Files

Transforming a file from a lossless to a lossy format results in data reduction. For instance, creating MP3 files from an audio CD inherently discards portions of the original audio information.

The smaller file size of the MP3 is a direct consequence of this data loss. Attempting to convert this lossy MP3 back to a lossless format, such as FLAC, will not restore the missing information.

The resulting FLAC file will be larger, but its quality will be limited to that of the original MP3. Lost data cannot be recovered through conversion. This is analogous to repeatedly copying a photocopy; each generation degrades the image quality.

Converting between different lossy formats is equally problematic. Transforming an MP3 file into OGG, for example, will lead to further data elimination. The quality diminishes with each successive conversion.

Conversely, conversions from lossless to lossless formats are entirely acceptable. Ripping an audio CD to FLAC files preserves the original audio fidelity.

Should you then convert those FLAC files to MP3, the resulting MP3s will be of comparable quality to those ripped directly from the CD. This demonstrates that the initial lossless source is crucial for optimal results.

Understanding the Implications

  • Converting lossy to lossless does not regain lost data.
  • Multiple conversions between lossy formats exacerbate quality degradation.
  • Lossless-to-lossless conversions maintain original quality.

Therefore, it’s vital to prioritize maintaining a lossless source whenever possible. This ensures the highest possible audio quality throughout any subsequent conversions.

what-lossless-file-formats-are-why-you-shouldnt-convert-lossy-to-lossless-3.jpg

Lossy vs. Lossless Formats: Making the Right Choice

The optimal selection between lossless and lossy formats is dictated by the intended application. For preserving a pristine digital archive, such as ripping an audio CD collection, lossless files are the preferred choice.

Conversely, when prioritizing file size for portable devices like MP3 players, lossy formats offer a practical alternative.

Image Formats and Their Applications

When preparing images for online display, employing a lossy format is recommended to minimize file size and improve loading times. However, it’s crucial to retain a backup copy of the original lossless file for future editing or high-quality reproduction.

Professional photo printing typically necessitates the use of a lossless format throughout the editing workflow to maintain image integrity.

PNG: A Special Case

PNG serves as a lossless format particularly well-suited for screenshots. It efficiently captures the flat colors commonly found on computer screens, producing sharp, appropriately-sized images.

However, PNG’s file size increases significantly when applied to photographs, due to the complex and varied color information inherent in real-world imagery.

Understanding the Trade-offs

The selection of a media file format involves inherent trade-offs. It’s essential to be cognizant of these considerations when making your decision.

For further clarification on image file type selection, consult our guide: What's the Difference Between JPG, PNG, and GIF?

Alternatively, explore the nuances of various audio file formats in our article: HTG Explains: What Are the Differences Between All Those Audio Formats?

This discussion originated from an online forum exchange. A user expressed dissatisfaction with a legally distributed BitTorrent containing music from the SXSW festival being offered in MP3 format rather than FLAC.

Another user suggested simply converting the MP3 files to FLAC. Hopefully, having read this explanation, the flawed logic behind that suggestion is now apparent.

#lossless#file formats#audio quality#lossy#MP3#FLAC