want to double your rate of return? seek counsel from experienced executives

The Timeline to Startup Exit and the Role of Executive Expertise

Is the commonly cited timeframe of seven to eight years for a startup to achieve a successful exit accurate? Furthermore, what strategies can founders in the early stages employ to expedite positive results?

Accelerating Outcomes with Experienced Leadership

We investigated whether founding teams demonstrate increased speed and success when leveraging the knowledge of seasoned executives. This inquiry stems directly from the core principle behind our venture model at M13.

Our firm was intentionally structured to provide early-stage founders with access to experienced executives who would typically be beyond their financial reach, or require significant time for recruitment, integration, and management.

Significant Impact of Executive Expertise

Analysis of data spanning numerous successful startups revealed that the influence of relevant executive expertise is substantial.

In fact, it effectively doubles the return on venture capital investments.

Challenges in Measuring Leadership Experience

While data regarding an executive’s tenure is generally accessible, quantifying a founding team’s overall seniority presents a challenge.

Specifically, there's a lack of readily available, structured information concerning when founders integrate more experienced operators and leaders into their teams.

Data Analysis Methodology

To determine if leadership experience correlates with startup success, we examined data from approximately 800 executives across over 200 companies.

These companies achieved significant exits – defined as a valuation of $500 million or greater – through either an Initial Public Offering (IPO) on a U.S. stock exchange or a Merger & Acquisition (M&A) between 2004 and 2019.

A large proportion, roughly 70%, of the companies in our dataset completed their exit between 2016 and 2019.

This includes well-known IPOs such as Spotify, Zoom, Uber, and Peloton.

We purposefully excluded companies operating within the biotechnology and life sciences sectors.

These industries typically follow distinct growth patterns and achieve exits via IPO or M&A at earlier stages compared to consumer and B2B technology companies.

Key Findings from Our Analysis

Our investigation into startups with successful exits yielded several important insights.

The Typical Timeline for Successful Startup Exits is 7-8 Years

The fundamental factors determining startup success are the time and financial investment needed to reach an exit, alongside the eventual size of that exit. While numerous intangible elements contribute, these represent the core equation.

Analysis of our data confirms the common understanding that achieving a successful exit generally requires approximately seven to eight years.

However, we investigated whether the inclusion of experienced leadership could potentially shorten this timeframe. The question arose: beyond time and capital, are there elements – such as leadership or operational experience – that can significantly improve exit results?

Furthermore, we sought to determine the optimal point at which to integrate these experienced human capital resources to maximize their impact.

Our examination of executive-level leadership focused on startups that had achieved successful exits. We specifically analyzed individuals holding positions such as CEO, CFO, COO, CTO, CPO, CRO, CMO, and CHRO (or equivalent leadership roles).

We then assessed the prior, relevant leadership experience of these individuals. This included factors like the number of years of post-graduate work experience, the number of companies they had previously been employed by, and the executive positions they had held in the past.

The Correlation Between Time, Funding, and Return on Investment

A recent analysis of startups that achieved successful exits reveals a significant relationship between founder experience, exit speed, and capital raised. Companies boasting multiple founders with established leadership backgrounds in relevant fields demonstrate an exit velocity 33% quicker than the average.

Interestingly, this accelerated exit is accompanied by a corresponding reduction in capital requirements. These ventures typically secure 34% less funding throughout their lifecycle.

When considered together, these two factors – faster exits and lower capital needs – have the potential to almost double the rate of return for investors.

Impact on Investor Returns: A Case Study

Our research indicates that achieving a $500 million exit in 4.7 years, representing a 33% acceleration compared to the standard seven-year timeframe, coupled with a 34% decrease in capital raised, substantially boosts investor returns.

Specifically, for a Series A lead investor contributing a $10 million investment for an initial 15% ownership stake, the theoretical Internal Rate of Return (IRR) experiences an 81% improvement.

Key Takeaways for Startups and Investors

• Experienced Founders: Prior leadership experience among founding team members is a strong indicator of faster exits.
• Capital Efficiency: Companies led by seasoned executives tend to be more capital efficient, requiring less external funding.
• IRR Improvement: The combination of speed and efficiency translates directly into significantly higher returns for investors.

These findings underscore the value of experienced leadership in driving startup success and maximizing investor value. A quicker exit, achieved with less capital, represents a compelling advantage in the competitive startup landscape.

Accelerated Exits: The Impact of Experienced Leadership

Analysis of successful startup exits reveals a significant correlation between leadership experience and time to exit. Companies founded by individuals with limited prior executive roles typically require an average of 9.6 years to achieve an exit.

Conversely, startups boasting two or more founders who possess demonstrable executive experience demonstrate a notably quicker timeline, exiting in approximately 6.4 years. This represents a 33% reduction in the time required to realize a return.

Key takeaway: The presence of multiple founders with established leadership backgrounds consistently shortens the exit timeline. Even high-performing companies, already positioned within the top 25% for exit velocity based on factors like market conditions and execution, benefit from this advantage.

This benefit persists regardless of other positive indicators. Founders with a history of senior leadership or operational roles contribute to faster exits, even when all other aspects of the business are already optimized.

The Value of Prior Experience

Having founders who have previously navigated the complexities of scaling a business offers distinct advantages. These include refined strategic decision-making and a more efficient approach to operational challenges.

Experienced leaders often possess established networks and a deeper understanding of market dynamics. This can facilitate quicker access to funding, strategic partnerships, and potential acquisition targets.

• Faster Decision-Making: Experienced leaders can quickly assess risks and opportunities.
• Improved Operational Efficiency: Prior experience translates to streamlined processes.
• Stronger Network Access: Established connections can accelerate growth.

Ultimately, incorporating individuals with proven leadership capabilities early in a startup’s lifecycle can significantly enhance its prospects for a successful and timely exit.

The presence of experienced founders correlates with quicker exits and reduced capital requirements, leading to improved investment returns.

Our research indicates that companies benefiting from founders with established leadership backgrounds not only achieve faster exits but also demonstrate a notable efficiency in capital raising, minimizing dilution for investors.

Typically, a company progresses through five to six funding rounds over a period of seven to eight years before reaching an exit. The average total capital raised, encompassing exit proceeds, amounts to $386 million.

Notably, ventures guided by founders possessing prior executive experience exhibit a 33% acceleration in their exit timeline. Furthermore, these companies require 34% less capital investment prior to exit, which significantly enhances the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

Companies founded by individuals lacking substantial executive experience generally secure $466 million in funding before exiting. Conversely, organizations with multiple founders who have held executive positions typically exit after raising $306 million.

Key Findings Summarized:

• Faster Exits: Companies with seasoned founders exit 33% more quickly.
• Reduced Capital Needs: These companies raise 34% less capital before an exit.
• Improved IRR: Lower capital requirements directly contribute to a higher Internal Rate of Return.
• Funding Amounts: Companies without experienced founders raise an average of $466 million, while those with raise $306 million.

The data clearly demonstrates a strong link between founder experience and positive financial outcomes for investors. Prior leadership experience appears to be a valuable asset in navigating the complexities of building and exiting a successful company.

Opportunities Remain for Companies to Enhance Leadership Through Strategic Early Hiring

Despite a recognized need for established leadership backgrounds, our investigation of startups achieving successful exits reveals a pattern of phased executive team development.

The data indicates that companies generally increase their C-level recruitment in a consistent manner leading up to an IPO, irrespective of initial size or the existing experience within their executive ranks. On average, four years prior to an exit event, these organizations possess only 43% of the total executive experience they will ultimately demonstrate at the time of exit.

Notably, even those companies beginning with substantial executive experience continue to augment their leadership capabilities at a comparable pace.

We contend that these findings validate M13’s venture approach and can inform decisions regarding the prioritization of hiring experienced executives. Executive experience enables organizations to anticipate potential challenges and obstacles, fostering proactive problem-solving and the application of established methodologies.

This proactive approach ultimately results in significant time savings for the company.

Data Sources and Methodology

Our analysis was conducted utilizing publicly accessible data from sources including Crunchbase, PitchBook, LinkedIn, and a range of news outlets. The study encompassed 783 executives from 201 companies that completed an IPO or were acquired through M&A transactions between 2004 and 2019.

The dataset focuses exclusively on listings on U.S. stock exchanges (Nasdaq and NYSE) across diverse sectors, with the exclusion of biotech and life sciences companies.

The companies were categorized by size based on IPO valuation:

• 112 small-sized companies, valued between $500 million and $2 billion.
• 73 medium-sized companies, valued between $2.1 billion and $9.2 billion.
• 16 large-sized companies, valued between $11 billion and $82 billion.

Key takeaway: Building a strong leadership team is a continuous process, even for high-growth companies.