Apple Subscription Addiction: Costs, Benefits & Future

The Evolving Challenges of Apple’s Subscription Model

Greetings, and welcome once again to Week in Review! Last time, we examined YouTube’s relative success in navigating platform responsibility debates, contrasting it with Facebook’s difficulties.

This week, our focus shifts to a potentially precarious situation Apple is currently facing as it expands its subscription services.

For those accessing this article directly on TechCrunch, you can subscribe to receive this content in your inbox via our newsletter page. You can also follow my updates on Twitter @lucasmtny.

Apple's Increasing Reliance on Subscriptions

Apple is progressively increasing its dependence on revenue generated through subscriptions. This strategy represents a significant shift from its historical reliance on hardware sales.

The company now offers a diverse portfolio of subscription-based services, including Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Apple Music, and iCloud storage. These services are designed to foster customer loyalty and generate recurring revenue streams.

Potential Issues and Concerns

However, this growing reliance on subscriptions introduces new challenges and potential pitfalls for Apple. One key concern revolves around maintaining a consistently high level of value for subscribers.

Should the perceived value of these services diminish, subscriber churn could significantly impact Apple’s financial performance. Competition within the streaming and digital services landscape is also intensifying.

Navigating a Slippery Slope

Apple is currently navigating a delicate balance. The company must continue to innovate and enhance its subscription offerings to justify ongoing costs.

Furthermore, Apple needs to carefully manage pricing and bundling strategies to remain competitive and attract new subscribers. The long-term success of this subscription-focused approach will depend on Apple’s ability to address these challenges effectively.

A Significant Transition for Apple

Having initially achieved a trillion-dollar market capitalization, and subsequently exceeding two trillion dollars, Apple is undoubtedly aware of the substantial challenges that lie ahead in its pursuit of becoming the first quadrillion-dollar company. Achieving this milestone will necessitate some potentially controversial strategic decisions.

Beyond mere speculation, Apple’s core business model is undergoing considerable evolution as it expands beyond simply selling new iPhones. The company is increasingly focused on securing customer loyalty through its devices and a growing ecosystem of subscription-based software services.

This week, Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, publicly criticized Apple for incorporating advertisements within its Settings application to promote its own services. Sweeney’s critique likely aimed to highlight perceived anti-competitive practices. However, my initial reaction upon encountering an advertisement for an Apple Music free trial within the Settings app was a sense of surprise – a feeling that it was somewhat inappropriate.

For a company valued at two trillion dollars, actively promoting purchases within the section of the app typically used for troubleshooting appears to be a rather questionable growth strategy. While it may seem like a minor instance, this departure from the traditionally clean and uncluttered Apple ecosystem is noteworthy.

Historically, pre-installed applications like the standard calculator or stocks app, while perhaps not universally favored, were not overly intrusive. However, as Apple aggressively promotes a growing portfolio of paid subscriptions – encompassing services such as Music, News+, tv+, Fitness+, Arcade, and iCloud+ – questions arise regarding the future direction of the company.

Apple is also developing increasingly intricate subscription packages that extend beyond individual applications. Its iCloud+ service, for example, now integrates backups with advanced privacy features exclusive to Safari for paying subscribers. Furthermore, various tiers of Apple One memberships offer bundled services at discounted rates, shareable with family members.

To Sweeney’s point, this evolving landscape presents challenges for developers competing against a product with inherent advantages within its own platform. It also potentially creates a less open experience for consumers who desire devices that seamlessly connect them to the wider web and its diverse range of services.

It’s important to acknowledge that Apple frequently faces scrutiny over seemingly minor issues because it has generally excelled at delivering streamlined and positive user experiences. Consumers have also become accustomed to witnessing other companies allow small issues to escalate into problematic incentives that gradually diminish product quality.

Therefore, an increase in promotional notifications, a misplaced advertisement, or an excessive number of introductory offers when setting up a new device can understandably raise concerns.

Apple’s transformation into a services-oriented business is not inherently problematic, but it’s crucial to recognize that this shift likely necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of its relationship with consumers. We are only beginning to observe these changes, and they may become more pronounced in the future.

Recent Developments in the Tech Landscape

This section will be undergoing refinement in the coming weeks, shifting from concise summaries to more detailed context. Feedback via Twitter is welcome to determine preference for headlines versus expanded discussion.

A security breach at Twitch raises concerns about the future of the leading game streaming platform. Amazon’s streaming service experienced a significant data leak, exposing source code and creator compensation details. This represents a substantial competitive disadvantage for Twitch, potentially benefiting rivals like Facebook Gaming and YouTube Gaming, who now possess valuable data for streamer recruitment.

Twitch currently maintains a dominant position in the game streaming market, although its lead is gradually diminishing due to the efforts of YouTube and Facebook to attract viewers. While many emerging streamers still favor Twitch as their initial platform, the success of competitors has largely relied on substantial financial investments in partner programs to secure established content creators. Consequently, the recently disclosed data holds considerable value for those competitors.

A Difficult Week for Facebook and its Affiliates

Facebook experienced an exceptionally challenging week, marked by a public relations crisis involving a whistleblower and a major service outage. The outage, lasting several hours, impacted all of the company’s global services and disrupted internal operations, causing widespread confusion and frustration, especially for users heavily reliant on WhatsApp for communication and business.

Despite facing considerable public criticism, Facebook’s leadership appears to perceive themselves as unfairly targeted and demonstrates a lack of self-reflection, as previously noted. The ongoing decline of Facebook’s brand reputation is concerning, but the potential for this decay to extend to its subsidiaries, such as Instagram, should be recognized as a critical issue by both management and shareholders.

The Risks of Investing in Synthetic Startup Shares

While perhaps less impactful than the aforementioned events, it’s important to address the recent emergence and swift shutdown of Visionrare, an NFT platform offering “fantasy startup investing.” The platform proposed a system resembling fantasy sports, allowing users to compete by building portfolios of synthetic NFT shares representing startups.

Following coverage of its launch, numerous investors and entrepreneurs highlighted potential legal challenges. In response, the founders promptly suspended the marketplace, intending to relaunch with a free-to-play model. Despite the often speculative nature of the NFT market, successful projects typically undergo thorough legal review to mitigate risks. In other NFT news, a piece of generative art was sold for $6.9 million, and a digital toad fetched a price of 420 ETH ($1.5 million).

Recent Insights from TechCrunch+

A selection of noteworthy articles from the recently rebranded TechCrunch+ subscription service is presented below.

Global startup funding reached $158 billion in the third quarter. The surge in venture capital investment, beginning in late 2020, has continued to fuel the growth of new companies worldwide.

This accelerated capital deployment has resulted in a greater number of unicorns, larger funding rounds, and an unprecedented level of available funding for startups.

Crafting an Effective Pitch Deck

At every Disrupt event, a session known as Pitch Deck Teardown is held. This interactive workshop allows founders to submit their pitch decks for live critique.

During TechCrunch Disrupt 2021, the session featured insights from Maren Bannon, co-founder and managing partner at January Ventures; Vanessa Larco, partner at NEA; and Ben Ling, founder and general partner of Bling Capital.

These venture capitalists provided valuable feedback on the decks, analyzing each slide in detail.

Securing Initial Funding: Perspectives from Top VCs

Nina Achadijan, a partner at Index Ventures, initially advised founders to carefully evaluate whether venture capital is truly necessary.

She highlighted the current favorable environment for early-stage entrepreneurs, noting the abundance of capital and the willingness to embrace new technologies.

Achadijan emphasized that many successful businesses can be established without relying on VC funding.