TechCrunch+ Roundup: BaaS, Growth Marketing & NerdWallet IPO

The Legacy of Enabling Innovation: From Gold Rush Supplies to Banking-as-a-Service

The vast majority of individuals who migrated to California during the Gold Rush have faded into historical obscurity.

However, Levi Strauss remains a recognizable name; prior to securing a patent for his iconic denim jeans, he initially provided essential tools like shovels and provisions to those pursuing their fortunes.

Contemporary banking-as-a-service (BaaS) startups occupy a comparable position.

Rather than directly competing within the saturated consumer financial services sector, these companies empower fintechs by granting them access to crucial APIs, regulatory compliance resources, and the software infrastructure necessary for facilitating financial transactions.

Exploring the BaaS Landscape

Recently, Ryan Lawler has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the BaaS ecosystem.

His latest investigation focuses on three distinct strategic approaches employed by these companies:

• Providing complete, turnkey banking-as-a-service solutions.
• Acting as intermediaries, connecting banks with fintech innovators.
• Acquiring existing banks to directly participate in the BaaS market.

Understanding the positioning of each competitor – and how they collaborate with both customers and banking institutions – is vital for any fintech aiming to launch a new application or integrate financial services into an existing business model, as Lawler points out.

Access to comprehensive TechCrunch+ articles is exclusive to members.
Utilize the discount code TCPLUSROUNDUP for a 20% reduction on one- or two-year subscriptions.

TechCrunch Contributor Program Discussion

A Twitter Spaces discussion regarding TechCrunch’s guest contributor program is scheduled for Tuesday, October 19, at 3 p.m. PT/6 p.m. ET.

Individuals interested in submitting content to TechCrunch or TechCrunch+ are encouraged to review our submission guidelines and participate in the conversation.

Don't hesitate to bring any questions you may have!

For a timely reminder, please follow @techcrunch on Twitter.

Thank you for your continued readership.

Walter Thompson
Senior Editor, TechCrunch+
@yourprotagonist

From Dorm Room Idea to Edtech Leadership

This year saw StuDocu, a platform for sharing study materials, secure $50 million in Series B funding. However, Marnix Broer, the CEO of StuDocu, reveals that the company’s origins weren’t focused on becoming an edtech startup.

The initial impetus was the development of a resource to aid their own academic pursuits while at university, as detailed in a TechCrunch+ article authored by Broer. He describes the evolution of the platform from simple storage on a USB drive to now supporting over 15 million users.

The company’s growth is a testament to identifying a need within the student community and scaling to meet it.

Early Stages and Problem Solving

Broer explains that the project began as a solution to a common student problem: accessing and organizing study materials. The initial focus was purely on personal utility.

Storing notes on a USB drive proved insufficient as the collection grew. This limitation spurred the development of a more robust and accessible system.

Scaling and Expansion

The platform’s evolution involved transitioning from a personal tool to a collaborative network. This shift was crucial for expanding its reach and impact.

Serving more than 15 million users demonstrates the significant demand for accessible and shared study resources. The company successfully addressed a widespread need within higher education.

Navigating Enterprise Sales: Common Missteps by Startups Like Slack

Competing with established enterprise-level organizations can appear challenging for startups. However, according to Jennifer Smith, CEO and co-founder of Scribe, initiating enterprise sales strategies should not be delayed.

A frequent error made by companies in their early phases is postponing the development of plans to challenge dominant industry players. This delay can be significantly disadvantageous, as illustrated by Slack’s acquisition by Salesforce for $27.2 billion twelve years after its inception.

Smith poses a critical question: could Slack have maintained its independence as a publicly traded company had it prioritized enterprise sales earlier in its trajectory?

The Importance of Early Enterprise Focus

Many startups underestimate the long-term benefits of engaging with larger enterprises from the outset. Focusing solely on smaller customers can limit growth potential.

A proactive approach to enterprise sales allows startups to build relationships and understand the complex needs of larger organizations. This understanding is crucial for product development and market positioning.

Why Slack’s Timing May Have Mattered

Slack’s eventual acquisition raises questions about the potential for a different outcome with a more focused enterprise strategy. A dedicated enterprise sales team and tailored product offerings could have altered its fate.

The company’s success within smaller teams doesn’t automatically translate to success with the more intricate requirements of enterprise clients. Different approaches are necessary.

Key Takeaways for Startups

• Start Early: Don’t wait for significant scale to begin thinking about enterprise sales.
• Understand Enterprise Needs: Research and address the specific challenges faced by larger organizations.
• Dedicated Resources: Allocate resources specifically for enterprise sales and support.

Successfully selling into the enterprise requires a strategic shift in mindset and execution. Ignoring this aspect can limit a startup’s long-term viability.

NerdWallet's IPO Documentation Highlights a Profitable Content Strategy and Increased Marketing Investment

Many may perceive NerdWallet as a financial technology firm distinguished by its effective marketing efforts. However, a review of the company’s S-1 filing led Alex Wilhelm to determine that it functions primarily as a highly effective content-driven business.

Wilhelm’s examination, featured in The Exchange, assessed NerdWallet’s performance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, its financial gains, and revenue expansion.

A key aspect of his analysis also considered the maintenance of user trust, specifically addressing this through an evaluation of its editorial independence.

Key Findings from the S-1 Filing

The S-1 documentation reveals that NerdWallet’s core strength lies in its ability to generate high-margin revenue through its content offerings.

This is achieved by providing valuable financial information and tools to consumers, which in turn drives revenue through affiliate partnerships and advertising.

Furthermore, the filing indicates an acceleration in marketing spend, suggesting a strategic focus on continued growth and market penetration.

Profitability and Pandemic Performance

NerdWallet demonstrated strong profitability, even amidst the economic uncertainties presented by the pandemic.

The company’s revenue continued to grow, indicating the resilience of its business model and the ongoing demand for its financial guidance.

This success is attributed to the company’s ability to adapt to changing consumer needs and provide relevant, timely information.

Maintaining Trust and Editorial Integrity

A crucial element of NerdWallet’s success is its ability to maintain user trust.

The company addresses this through a commitment to editorial independence, ensuring that its content remains unbiased and objective.

This approach is vital for establishing credibility and fostering long-term relationships with its audience.

• Content is the primary driver of revenue.
• Marketing investments are increasing.
• Profitability remained strong during the pandemic.
• Editorial independence is key to maintaining user trust.

Lessons in Frugality for Fintech Founders from Industry Pioneers

Dave Mullen, an investor specializing in fintech at SVB Capital, examines the capital allocation practices of prominent fintech companies.

A growing number of fintech startups are now valued at $10 billion or more. Consequently, their spending habits offer valuable insights into achieving market leadership.

Mullen presents his analysis in a guest article, utilizing data from companies like Coinbase, Robinhood, Affirm, Chime, and Marqeta to provide guidance for fintech founders.

While financial resources can drive expansion, they do not automatically ensure a sustainable and successful business model.

Analyzing Capital Allocation Strategies

The examined companies demonstrate diverse approaches to utilizing their substantial funding.

Understanding these strategies is crucial for founders seeking to maximize the impact of their own capital.

• Coinbase prioritized strategic acquisitions to expand its product offerings.
• Robinhood focused heavily on marketing to acquire a large user base.
• Affirm invested significantly in research and development to innovate its lending platform.

Each company’s choices reflect its unique business model and target market.

Key Takeaways for Fintech Startups

Mullen emphasizes that effective capital allocation goes beyond simply spending money.

Founders should prioritize investments that directly contribute to long-term value creation.

A disciplined approach to spending, coupled with a clear understanding of market dynamics, is essential for success.

Strategic investments in areas like technology and talent are more likely to yield positive returns than broad-based marketing campaigns.

The Importance of Sustainable Growth

The analysis highlights the risk of relying solely on financial resources for growth.

Sustainable growth requires a strong business foundation and a clear path to profitability.

Fintech founders should focus on building a resilient business model that can withstand market fluctuations.

The Next Phase of MSP Consolidation is Fueled by Private Equity

A positive development is that organizations across various sectors are accelerating their digital transformations. This presents significant opportunities for businesses that proactively embrace this shift.

However, a challenge exists as many skilled technology professionals are actively seeking new employment. Companies are therefore facing increased competition in their efforts to recruit qualified personnel capable of establishing resilient and secure IT infrastructures.

Managed Services Providers (MSPs) are effectively addressing this need, and this has not gone unnoticed by private equity firms.

According to Mike McGill and Kevin Jolley from Cowen and Company, LLC, “MSPs possess characteristics highly attractive to private equity investors.”

These characteristics include a robust and growing market demand, a minimal risk of becoming outdated, a service offering that fosters customer loyalty and generates consistent revenue streams, substantial cash flow margins, and a business model requiring relatively few physical assets.

The demand for IT services is consistently increasing, making MSPs a stable investment.

Why MSPs are Attractive to Investors

• Strong Demand Trend: The need for managed IT services continues to grow.
• Low Obsolescence Risk: IT is constantly evolving, but MSPs adapt.
• Customer Retention: MSPs build long-term relationships with clients.
• Recurring Revenue: Subscription-based models provide predictable income.
• High Cash Flow: MSPs generally operate with healthy profit margins.
• Asset-Light Business: Minimal capital expenditure is required.

Private equity investment is expected to drive further MSP consolidation in the coming years.

This consolidation will likely lead to larger, more comprehensive MSPs capable of serving a wider range of client needs. The current market conditions are exceptionally favorable for this trend.

Frequent Growth Marketing Errors Committed by Startups

Articles explicitly detailing errors or inefficient workflows are not frequently published. Generally, most teams possess a clear understanding of existing challenges and prioritize identifying solutions.

However, growth marketing specialist Jonathan Martinez contributed a guest article outlining approaches to address these widespread problems.

Common Pitfalls in Startup Growth Marketing

• A sluggish rate of experimentation.
• Dependence on inaccurate metrics.
• An exclusive concentration on acquiring initial traffic.
• A failure to demonstrate true incremental impact.
• Inadequate collaboration between product and growth teams.

These issues can significantly hinder a startup’s ability to scale effectively.

Low testing velocity often stems from complex processes or a fear of failure. Rapid iteration is crucial for identifying what resonates with users.

Relying on incorrect measurements can lead to misguided strategies. Accurate data is fundamental for informed decision-making.

A focus only on top-of-funnel traffic neglects the importance of conversion and retention. Attracting visitors is only the first step.

A lack of incrementality makes it difficult to determine the true value of marketing efforts. Measuring the *additional* impact of campaigns is essential.

Insufficient product-growth integration creates a disconnect between development and marketing. Close collaboration ensures that product improvements align with growth objectives.

Addressing These Challenges

Overcoming these hurdles requires a commitment to data-driven decision-making and cross-functional collaboration.

Prioritizing experimentation, refining measurement methodologies, and broadening the scope of growth initiatives are key steps toward sustainable success.

The IPO Market Faces Pressure to Accommodate Venture Capital Exits

A substantial increase in initial public offerings (IPOs) will be necessary for the venture capital industry to successfully realize its investments.

The current abundance of global venture capital funding has led to a proliferation of unicorn companies across numerous geographic locations.

The Growing Need for Exits

As Alex Wilhelm details in The Exchange, this surge in private-market valuation inevitably creates a larger volume of unrealized value that requires an exit strategy.

Consequently, a significant number of private companies will eventually seek public market listings.

Antitrust Concerns and Acquisition Limitations

Several major U.S. technology companies are reducing their acquisition activity due to heightened scrutiny from antitrust regulators.

This shift in strategy implicitly places greater reliance on the IPO market to absorb the growing number of mature, privately held companies.

The expectation is that the IPO pipeline will need to expand to accommodate a potential influx of unicorn debuts.