Kim Kardashian on ChatGPT: 'Frenemy' Status Revealed

Kim Kardashian's Experience with ChatGPT and Legal Studies

The notion that celebrities share common experiences with everyday individuals is often debated. Recently, Kim Kardashian, currently pursuing legal education, revealed a challenging dynamic with ChatGPT in a Vanity Fair interview.

She confessed to relying on the AI for legal guidance, utilizing it by submitting images of questions. However, Kardashian admitted that this practice has led to failing grades on law school examinations due to the provision of inaccurate information.

The Problem of AI Hallucinations

ChatGPT, like many large language models (LLMs), is susceptible to “hallucinations.” This means it can generate fabricated responses when lacking a definitive answer, rather than acknowledging its limitations.

The technology operates by analyzing an immense dataset and predicting the most probable response to a given prompt. This predictive process doesn't inherently prioritize factual correctness, potentially resulting in inaccurate outputs.

The consequences of relying on such inaccuracies are becoming apparent. Several legal professionals have faced penalties for incorporating fabricated case citations generated by ChatGPT into their legal documents.

Attempting Emotional Appeals to an AI

Interestingly, Kardashian described attempting to appeal to ChatGPT’s emotions after receiving incorrect advice. She would question the AI about the implications of causing her to fail.

However, this approach is fundamentally flawed, as ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence and lacks the capacity for feelings or emotional understanding. The AI responded by suggesting that the experience was intended to encourage her to trust her own judgment.

Human Reactions to AI Interactions

Despite ChatGPT’s lack of sentience, its interactions can evoke strong emotional responses in humans. Kardashian shared that she frequently screenshots conversations with the AI to share with her friends.

She expressed her frustration with the AI’s responses, using strong language to convey her disbelief and annoyance at the way it communicates.

Here's a summary of the key takeaways:

• ChatGPT can provide inaccurate legal information.
• The AI is prone to "hallucinations" and fabricating answers.
• Relying on ChatGPT for critical tasks like legal studies can have negative consequences.
• Attempting emotional appeals to an AI is ineffective.
• Interactions with AI can still elicit strong human emotions.