Chip Credit Cards in the USA: A Complete Guide

The Transition to Chip-Enabled Credit Cards in the USA
Chip-enabled credit cards, already widely adopted internationally, are now being implemented across the United States. This shift marks a significant change in payment security and processing.
Credit cards that rely solely on magnetic stripes are gradually being replaced, driven by a key deadline of October 1, 2015.
Understanding the Changeover
Cardholders can anticipate receiving replacement cards equipped with a chip in the near future. This upgrade is being rolled out by financial institutions nationwide.
While a complete nationwide transition won't occur precisely on October 1st, those retailers and banks that fail to adopt chip card technology will face increased financial responsibility for fraudulent transactions.
Liability and Adoption
The move to chip cards is designed to reduce credit card fraud. The new system makes it more difficult for criminals to counterfeit cards.
Specifically, merchants and financial institutions that haven't upgraded their systems will be held liable for certain types of fraudulent charges. This incentivizes widespread adoption of the more secure chip technology.
Here's a breakdown of the key implications:
- Magnetic stripe-only cards are becoming obsolete.
- Chip cards offer enhanced security features.
- Retailers and banks share responsibility for fraud prevention.
Utilizing Chip Card Technology
When employing a credit card equipped with a chip, the process differs from traditional magnetic stripe cards. The card is inserted into the payment terminal at the bottom, and it must remain there throughout the entire transaction.
It is crucial to keep the card inserted until the transaction is fully completed. Unlike older cards, chip cards are not designed to be swiped.
Modern payment terminals are often compatible with both chip and magnetic stripe technology. However, attempting to swipe a chip card may prompt the terminal to request insertion for chip-based payment processing.
Chip cards offer enhanced security features compared to magnetic stripe cards, making them a preferred method of payment.
The duration of the transaction while using a chip card will vary. It is important to follow the on-screen prompts provided by the payment terminal.
Benefits of Chip Card Usage
- Increased security against fraud.
- Global acceptance at a growing number of merchants.
- A more secure payment experience overall.
By understanding the proper method for using a chip card, consumers can benefit from its enhanced security and convenience. Always prioritize inserting the card when given the option.
Understanding EMV Chip Card Technology
Modern credit and debit cards utilize the EMV standard, an acronym representing Europay, Mastercard, and Visa. This globally adopted standard facilitates interoperability between chip-enabled cards and payment terminals, including those at retail locations and ATMs.
It’s important to recognize that the traditional magnetic stripe remains in use. Current chip cards are equipped with both an EMV chip and a magnetic stripe, ensuring compatibility with older payment systems.
The magnetic stripe is vulnerable to cloning through simple swiping, allowing for the illicit duplication of card data and subsequent fraudulent transactions. Conversely, chip cards employ a more secure method.
These cards contain a microchip that generates a unique, one-time transaction code with each insertion into a compatible terminal. This code is valid for that single transaction only, significantly hindering the ability to create counterfeit cards.
Consequently, sensitive payment information is linked to this ephemeral code, enhancing security. Had the United States adopted chip card technology sooner, the severity of data breaches, such as the one experienced by Target, could potentially have been lessened.
The compromised payment details from such incidents would have been far less valuable to malicious actors.
The October 1st Liability Transition
For over a year, financial institutions in the United States have been distributing chip-enabled cards in preparation for a significant date: October 1, 2015. Following this date, a "liability shift" will be implemented. Retailers who opt to process payments using the magnetic stripe on chip cards will retain the responsibility for any resulting fraudulent transactions.
Furthermore, financial institutions – including banks issuing Visa and Mastercard credit cards – that have not issued EMV-compliant cards will also be held accountable for fraudulent charges.
Essentially, Visa and Mastercard are communicating to both banks and retailers that continued reliance on the older payment system will be undertaken at their own financial peril. While a complete transition won't occur immediately, those who delay will face increased financial risk, incentivizing a swift upgrade.
Understanding the Shift in Responsibility
It’s important to note that this change does not directly impact consumer liability. If a bank fails to provide a customer with a chip-and-PIN credit card prior to October 1st, the bank, not the customer, assumes the associated risk.
These arrangements are primarily a matter between retailers, banks, Visa, and Mastercard. They are the driving force behind the rapid deployment of chip card technology.
- The liability shift encourages adoption of EMV chip technology.
- Retailers choosing to use magnetic stripes assume fraud risk.
- Banks not issuing chip cards also face financial responsibility.
This transition aims to enhance payment security and reduce credit card fraud across the United States. The shift in liability is a key component of this strategy.
Chip and PIN Compared to Chip and Signature
Numerous nations transitioned from magnetic stripe transactions to a chip-and-PIN system. This involves inserting the chip card into a payment terminal and then entering a numerical Personal Identification Number (PIN) on the terminal for authentication. The process closely resembles using a debit card with a PIN – a signature is not required.
However, the United States primarily adopted a chip-and-signature system. With this method, the chip card is inserted into the terminal, and the cardholder then signs their name, mirroring the process used with traditional credit cards.
Security Concerns with Signatures
It’s widely acknowledged that credit card signatures offer limited security. Verification of signature matches against the card’s back-of-card signature is often inconsistent. Consequently, if a chip-and-signature card is compromised, it can still be utilized for purchases at chip-enabled terminals.
A potential drawback is that these chip-and-signature cards may not function seamlessly with EMV systems in countries where chip-and-PIN authentication is standard.
Reasons for the US Approach
One credit card provider explained the rationale behind choosing chip-and-signature over chip-and-PIN:
"Our assessment is that retraining American consumers to perform multiple actions simultaneously presents a challenge. Therefore, we will initially focus on familiarizing them with the chip insertion process. Should a significant security incident occur, prompting consumer demand for PINs, we will re-evaluate our approach."
Implementing a chip-and-PIN system would necessitate customers memorizing a PIN for each credit card. The initial rollout of chip cards in the US does not introduce a new verification method, only a revised card usage procedure at payment terminals, retaining the existing signature requirement.
Bank Security Considerations
While retailers generally favor chip-and-PIN, banks have expressed reluctance. Entering a PIN at an ATM requires its input. If this PIN is consistently used for card transactions, it increases the risk of eavesdropping and PIN capture. Using a PIN exclusively for ATM withdrawals, while relying on signatures for most purchases, safeguards banks against fraudulent ATM activity.
The adoption of chip technology, even with signature verification, represents an improvement in security over magnetic stripe cards.
Visual Aids
Credit: Man using payment terminal keypad enter personal identyfication number
Credit: Bank terminal and black pen on the reception desk
EMV Cards and the Persistence of Fraud
EMV cards, despite their advanced technology, do not represent a complete solution to the issue of fraudulent transactions. Information such as card numbers, expiration dates, and the three-digit CVV code remain present on the card itself.
This data can be compromised and utilized for online purchases, circumventing the security features of the chip. Furthermore, chip-and-signature cards are still vulnerable to fraudulent use with forged signatures at physical point-of-sale locations.
The traditional magnetic stripe remains functional on many terminals globally, offering another avenue for unauthorized transactions. This means older methods of fraud are not entirely obsolete.
However, it’s important to note that EMV technology significantly raises the bar for fraudsters. It introduces complexities that make illicit activity more challenging to execute successfully.
This increased difficulty also contributes to the prevention of large-scale data breaches, such as the one experienced by Target, by reducing the potential for widespread compromise.
Contactless Payments and NFC Technology
Certain EMV cards incorporate NFC (Near Field Communication) technology, enabling contactless payments. This functionality mirrors the experience of using mobile payment systems like Apple Pay or Google Wallet.
Users simply tap their card on a compatible reader to complete a transaction. These NFC payments typically do not require a signature or PIN, and are generally limited to smaller transaction amounts.