LOGO

Best File Compression Format: A Benchmarking Guide

November 5, 2014
Best File Compression Format: A Benchmarking Guide

File Compression Format Benchmarks: Finding the Optimal Choice

The need to reduce file sizes frequently arises, prompting the question of which compression format is most effective. Options like Zip, RAR, and 7z are commonly considered, but which truly delivers the highest level of compression?

We conducted a series of benchmarks to identify the format that achieves the greatest compression rates.

Beyond Compression Ratio: Usability and Software Requirements

While the compression ratio is a crucial metric, it isn't the sole determinant. The ease of use of a particular format is also significant.

Some formats benefit from native integration within desktop operating systems, simplifying the compression and extraction process.

Conversely, other formats necessitate the installation of dedicated third-party software to function.

Comparing Popular Compression Formats

  • Zip: Widely supported and often pre-installed on many systems.
  • RAR: Known for its advanced features and generally better compression than Zip.
  • 7z: Offers a high compression ratio and is open-source.

The choice ultimately depends on a balance between compression performance and user convenience.

Our benchmarks aimed to quantify these trade-offs, providing a data-driven basis for selecting the most appropriate compression format for specific needs.

File Compression Performance Evaluation

Achieving optimal file compression is a nuanced process. The degree of compression attained isn't solely determined by the archive format selected, but also by the compression application utilized and its specific configuration. To maintain clarity, we employed widely-used applications with their default settings throughout our testing.

We deliberately avoided common file types already employing compression techniques, such as Microsoft Word DOCX files (which utilize Zip compression internally) and JPG images (which also incorporate compression). Instead, our focus was on compressing fully installed PC games.

PC games represent a diverse and realistic dataset, encompassing graphics, audio, text files, executable programs, and a multitude of other file types. This makes them ideal for evaluating compression effectiveness across various data formats.

Initially, we installed the game Bastion and then compressed its directory – a collection of approximately 863 MB of game assets, including music, graphics, executables, and diverse document types:

  • Zip (Windows 8.1): 746 MB (86.4% of the original size)
  • Zip (WinZip): 745 MB (86.3% of the original size)
  • RAR (WinRAR): 746 MB (86.4% of the original size)
  • 7z (7-Zip): 734 MB (85% of the original size)

Subsequently, we compressed Hotline Miami, a game comprising 654 MB of data:

  • Zip (Windows 8.1): 316 MB (48.3% of the original size)
  • Zip (WinZip): 314 MB (48% of the original size)
  • RAR (WinRAR): 307 MB (46.9% of the original size)
  • 7z (7-Zip): 301 MB (46% of the original size)

Compression Results Overview

The results demonstrate that 7-Zip consistently delivered the highest compression ratios in our tests. While the differences between formats aren't always substantial, 7z generally outperformed Zip and RAR in reducing file sizes.

It's important to note that compression performance can vary significantly depending on the specific files being compressed. The characteristics of the data play a crucial role in determining how effectively each compression algorithm can reduce the file size.

Determining the Optimal File Compression Format

Based on our compression tests, 7z emerges as the clear victor. This outcome aligns with our prior observations, as 7z consistently achieves leading results in file compression benchmarks. For those prioritizing minimal file size, utilizing 7z is highly recommended.

Furthermore, the compression level can be increased within 7z to achieve even greater space savings. However, it’s important to note that higher compression settings will correspondingly extend both the compression and decompression times.

Zip and RAR formats demonstrated comparable performance throughout the testing process. WinZip’s compression capabilities were found to be only marginally superior to the native Zip support provided by most operating systems.

Consequently, our recommendations are as follows:

  • For optimal compression ratios, employ 7z archives created with the 7-Zip application.
  • When ease of use and broad compatibility are paramount, generating Zip files using your operating system’s built-in functionality is advised.

On Windows, for instance, simply select the desired files within Windows Explorer or File Explorer, right-click, navigate to the "Send To" option, and choose "Compressed (zipped) folder."

benchmarked-whats-the-best-file-compression-format-2.jpg

Operating System Compatibility for Archive Formats

When creating compressed files for personal use, the choice of archive format is largely a matter of preference. However, ensuring broad compatibility is crucial when sharing archives with others or distributing them online. Utilizing a format readily accessible across various operating systems minimizes the need for recipients to install additional software.

Below is a breakdown of archive format support across common operating systems:

  • Windows: Native support is limited to the Zip format. This functionality has been a standard feature since Windows XP, ensuring widespread usability among Windows users.
  • macOS: The operating system natively supports Zip archives, alongside other formats such as .tar.gz and .tar.bz2. Opening .7z and .rar files typically requires the installation of third-party applications.
  • Linux: Zip archives are generally supported without additional configuration. While 7z and RAR files can be handled by standard tools like File Roller, installing command-line utilities via the package manager is often necessary. Tar formats, including .tar.gz and .tar.bz2, are natively supported.
  • Chrome OS: Both Zip and RAR archives are supported. Furthermore, the Files app can open and extract the contents of .tar.gz and .tar.bz2 archives.

Windows exhibits the most limited support, exclusively offering native Zip functionality. Consequently, Zip remains the most universally compatible format. Users of macOS or Linux may consider employing .tar formats as an alternative.

7z demonstrates the least widespread support, lacking native integration within any major operating system and necessitating the installation of dedicated software. However, for achieving optimal compression ratios, 7z is a highly effective choice.

It's important to note that all compression benchmarks provide approximate results. Variations in data type and content can influence compression outcomes. While we are satisfied with the overall findings, individual experiences may differ based on the specific data being compressed.

#file compression#compression format#zip#gzip#bzip2#xz