Android Based on Linux: Understanding the Connection
Android and Linux: A Clarification
While Android utilizes the Linux kernel as its foundation, it diverges significantly from standard Linux systems commonly encountered on personal computers.
Direct compatibility between Android applications and conventional Linux distributions is absent. Conversely, Linux programs designed for desktop environments are not natively executable on Android devices.
The Core Difference
The Linux kernel forms the central component of Android’s architecture. However, Google has intentionally omitted numerous software packages and libraries typically included in a full-fledged Linux distribution, such as Ubuntu.
This deliberate omission is the key factor distinguishing Android from its Linux origins. It results in a fundamentally different operating environment.
Android is built upon Linux, but it's a customized implementation.
- Standard Linux distributions and Android are not mutually compatible.
- The absence of common software and libraries defines the difference.
The Distinction Between "Linux" and the Linux Kernel
A common point of confusion arises from the varied interpretations of the term "Linux." While frequently used as a general descriptor, "Linux" can refer to different components. Fundamentally, Linux signifies the Linux kernel, which represents the central component of any operating system.
The term "Linux" is also often employed to denote Linux distributions. However, it’s crucial to understand that these distributions encompass far more than just the kernel itself.
They integrate numerous software packages, including the GNU shell utilities, the Xorg graphical server, desktop environments like GNOME, and applications such as the Firefox web browser. Consequently, some advocate for the use of "GNU/Linux" when referencing distributions like Ubuntu, Mint, Debian, Fedora, Arch, and openSUSE.
Android leverages the Linux kernel as its foundation. The open-source nature of Linux allowed Google’s developers to adapt the kernel to meet the specific requirements of the Android platform.
This provided a pre-existing and actively maintained operating system kernel, eliminating the need for Google to develop one from scratch. Similar approaches are seen in other devices; the PlayStation 4 utilizes the FreeBSD kernel, while the Xbox One relies on the Windows NT kernel.
The version of the Linux kernel powering your device can often be found within the settings menu, typically under sections labeled "About phone" or "About tablet" in Android.
How Linux is Used in Different Systems
- Android: Modified Linux kernel for mobile devices.
- PlayStation 4: Utilizes the open-source FreeBSD kernel.
- Xbox One: Employs the Windows NT kernel.
Understanding this distinction is key to accurately discussing operating systems and their underlying components. The kernel is the core, while the distribution is the complete package.
Distinguishing Features
Android's relationship to Linux distributions is a frequent topic of discussion. While it leverages the Linux kernel and associated components, its overall software composition diverges significantly from conventional Linux distributions.
Upon startup, an Android device initiates the Linux kernel in a manner comparable to a standard Linux distribution. Nevertheless, substantial differences exist in the accompanying software stack.
Unlike typical Linux systems, Android omits the GNU C Library (glibc) and a comprehensive suite of GNU libraries. Furthermore, it forgoes an X server, such as Xorg, preventing the direct execution of standard graphical Linux applications.
Instead of running conventional Linux programs, Android employs the Dalvik virtual machine. This allows it to execute applications developed in Java, specifically designed for Android devices and their respective application programming interfaces (APIs).
These applications are not generally compatible with the broader Linux ecosystem.
Key Differences Summarized
- Android utilizes the Linux kernel as its foundation.
- It diverges from standard distributions by excluding glibc and core GNU libraries.
- The absence of an X server restricts the execution of typical Linux graphical applications.
- Android relies on the Dalvik virtual machine for Java-based application execution.
Therefore, while rooted in Linux, Android represents a distinct operating system environment tailored for mobile devices.
The Incompatibility of Desktop Linux Software with Android
Related: What Is Unix, and Why Does It Matter?
A fundamental difference in system architecture prevents the direct execution of Linux desktop applications on Android devices. Android lacks essential components like a graphical X server and the complete set of GNU libraries required by these applications.
While Android incorporates a shell environment similar to those found in Linux distributions, it isn't readily accessible to users. Access to this terminal can be achieved through the installation of applications such as Android Terminal Emulator.
However, even with terminal access, functionality is initially limited. The environment operates with restrictions, preventing full root shell access without rooting the Android device. Essential commands are often missing, leading rooted users to install BusyBox, a suite of common command-line utilities.
These utilities are crucial for applications leveraging root privileges to perform system-level operations.
The Incompatibility of Android Software with Desktop Linux
Related: Methods for Playing Android Games (and Utilizing Android Applications) on Windows
A fundamental reason why Android applications are not natively executable on Linux stems from the absence of the Dalvik virtual machine within the Linux environment. Simply transferring Android’s software components to a desktop Linux system is insufficient.
Additional development is required to enable Android applications to interface with a standard desktop environment via Xorg, for instance. While technically feasible, running Dalvik on desktop Linux would necessitate significant effort from developers.
The discontinued “Ubuntu for Android” project previously explored this concept, aiming to integrate both operating systems on a single device and facilitate the execution of Android apps on Ubuntu’s desktop interface.
Emulation as an Alternative
Solutions like BlueStacks and other Android emulators address this limitation for Windows and macOS. These programs operate Android within a virtual machine, simulating the necessary hardware to run Android applications.
However, this approach inevitably introduces a performance overhead. Despite their existence, these emulation-based solutions have not achieved widespread adoption.
It's important to note that Google’s Chrome OS, too, is built upon the Linux kernel. Similar to Android, Chrome OS lacks a conventional X window system, preventing the direct execution of standard Linux applications.
However, Chrome OS possesses greater compatibility with standard desktop Linux distributions than Android does. This allows users to enable developer mode and install the necessary desktop software components.
Image Credit: ranti on Flickr, Anatomy and Physiology of Android