9 Strange US Government Efforts to Make Use of the Internet

A Perspective on US Government Online Resources

Let me state upfront that this is not intended as a criticism of the US Government itself. I am a law-abiding and patriotic American citizen, and I want to be clear about that.

Indeed, MUO frequently features articles highlighting valuable online resources provided by the US Government. A prime example is my compilation of data mashups available on official government websites.

Personal Dislike of Inefficiency

However, I harbor a strong personal aversion to bureaucratic processes and a perceived absence of practical reasoning. While numerous excellent websites and online tools are offered by the US Government, a significant number appear rather unnecessary.

In certain instances, the expenditure of public funds is remarkably conspicuous, and it is reasonable for US taxpayers to express their discontent.

The issue isn't a lack of good intentions, but rather a demonstrable inefficiency in resource allocation.

Examples of Questionable Online Projects

Some websites duplicate information readily available elsewhere.
Others offer services with extremely limited practical application.
A few appear to serve no discernible purpose whatsoever.

Taxpayer money is a precious commodity, and its responsible use is paramount.

It’s important to acknowledge the positive contributions of government websites, but also to critically evaluate where improvements can be made.

A more streamlined and focused approach to online resource development would ultimately benefit all citizens.

Are Government Websites Truly Engaging for Children?

Readers familiar with George Orwell’s 1984 may recognize the unsettling nature of governmental attempts at “educating” young people. Concerns regarding indoctrination and the spread of propaganda naturally arise. Those who experienced schooling during the Cold War era will likely recall the “Duck and Cover” drills.

Currently, with anxieties surrounding terrorism, natural disasters, and global pandemics, the U.S. Government is focused on preparing citizens for potential crises through Ready.gov. Perhaps the most concerning aspect of this official site is the “Ready Kids” section, which aims to inform children about the various threats families could encounter and the importance of preparedness.

Another governmental body seemingly lacking insight into effective communication with children is the US Treasury. The Treasury's website for young audiences, TreasuryDirect Kids, presents explanations and definitions that are unlikely to be grasped by anyone under the age of 18.

It appears improbable that the creators of this resource genuinely believe it appropriate to employ terminology such as “inflation-protected securities” on a platform intended for young children learning about financial matters. The phrasing seems remarkably complex for the target demographic.

Conversely, Census.gov takes a different approach. The individuals responsible for conducting the U.S. Census have opted to emulate other government agencies by providing a dedicated section of their website for children. Here, children can engage in a simple game focused on counting objects.

This approach struck me as particularly amusing.

Lastly, CollegeDrinkingPrevention.org is a U.S. Government website geared towards an older demographic – college students. While the intention behind the site is laudable, its overall concept feels somewhat misguided.

While educating college students about the risks associated with excessive alcohol consumption is undoubtedly valuable, it’s questionable whether they would actively seek information from a government website, preferring instead to watch lighthearted videos or review lists detailing “Facts About Alcohol Poisoning?”

Unusual and Inefficient Government Websites

Aside from websites designed for children, numerous US Government online platforms intended for adult audiences appear remarkably unnecessary and peculiar. A particularly unsettling example originates from the US Geological Survey.

The USGS established a webpage soliciting public input regarding potential solutions to the global challenge of overpopulation.

Frankly, the nature of the "innovative" suggestions submitted via the website's forms is a source of apprehension.

Let's test your knowledge with a brief question. Which entity is responsible for the printing of US currency? Is it the US Federal Reserve, or perhaps the US Mint? The answer is neither.

The task actually falls to a relatively unknown agency known as the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

The website presents the production of US currency as a commercial enterprise, featuring monthly production statistics and even an online store offering limited-edition currency for purchase.

Perhaps the most amusing government website is that of the Office of Government Ethics. This office is responsible for formulating the ethical standards and regulations governing politicians within the Executive Branch.

The site's humor stems from the likelihood that it remains largely unvisited by many US politicians.

Here’s a second quiz question: Do you recall Ronald Reagan’s well-known “Star Wars” missile defense program? It dominated discussions in the 1980s, but gradually faded from public attention.

However, the initiative continues to thrive within the Missile Defense Agency.

Despite the end of the Cold War, personnel at the DoD are actively developing advanced interceptor missiles capable of neutralizing ballistic threats. A dedicated "Business Opportunities" section is even available for prospective ballistic missile entrepreneurs.

The final website I wish to highlight is somewhat disconcerting. Fans of Spongebob Squarepants may remember Plankton’s “evil plan Z” for global domination.

The Department of Defense “Unified Command Plan” webpage bears a striking resemblance to a US equivalent of that scheme.

The structure features "combatant commanders" overseeing each global region, effectively creating a world map illustrating potential dominance.

It is possible that my assessment is somewhat cynical and critical. Nevertheless, is it prudent to allocate funds and resources to these government websites when the nation and the world face significant challenges?

Shouldn't the creation and maintenance of government websites be more efficient and carefully considered?

What are your views on US Government websites? Do you have examples of similarly unusual government platforms in your own country? Please share your opinions in the comments below.

Photo credit: Boris15