Technology in School: The Downsides You Need to Know

The Transition to Digital Textbooks: A Student's Perspective
The assertion that e-books will ultimately eclipse traditional print books is frequently voiced, framing the question not as if, but when. As a current college student, I began to investigate whether this trend extends to e-textbooks.
The increasing discussion surrounding e-textbooks is largely driven by their cost-effectiveness and the reduced physical strain on students. The prospect of avoiding heavy backpacks is certainly appealing.
A Semester with Digital Texts
However, my experience this semester, utilizing an Android tablet (an Acer Iconia A500) to manage all coursework, suggests a more nuanced reality.
While the tablet itself performs admirably, integrating technology into the academic environment presents unique challenges.
The initial excitement surrounding devices like the Kno tablet, which promised a revolutionary approach to learning, ultimately failed to gain widespread adoption within educational institutions.
Resistance to Digital Adoption
Universities, professors, and students alike appear hesitant to fully embrace digital textbooks.
Not all instructors readily facilitate the use of laptops or tablets as substitutes for traditional pen-and-paper methods.
This lack of consistent support creates obstacles for students seeking a fully digital learning experience.
Consequently, despite the potential benefits, my experience indicates that transitioning to e-textbooks can, at present, be more cumbersome than convenient.
It's clear that a shift in pedagogical approaches and institutional support is necessary to truly unlock the advantages of digital learning materials.
The Paradox of Open-Book Exams and E-Textbooks
The debate surrounding e-books versus traditional textbooks extends beyond aesthetic preferences. It delves into the practical challenges of fully transitioning from physical books to digital formats.
Challenges to Digital Textbook Adoption
Despite the increasing popularity of tablets – beginning with the initial iPad release – many educators remain hesitant to embrace digital textbooks. A significant concern voiced by professors is the increased potential for academic dishonesty.
With web-enabled devices readily available, students could easily seek assistance during tests. This could involve contacting family members or simply searching for answers online.
Limitations in Assessment Methods
The presence of e-books and internet access complicates test design for instructors. Creating assessments that prevent cheating requires additional effort and can be frustrating.
Consequently, professors may be less inclined to offer open-notes or open-textbook exams, even when the material is complex. Currently, a disparity exists between students using physical books and those utilizing digital versions.
Disadvantages for Digital Textbook Users
Students who opt for digital textbooks often find themselves at a disadvantage during open-book assessments. Publishers frequently impose restrictions on printing, creating obstacles for these students.
For example, many digital textbooks limit users to printing only a small number of pages at a time, such as ten pages.
Circumventing Publisher Restrictions
To overcome these limitations, students may attempt to print sections of their textbooks for exams, but this is often prohibited by the publisher.
This leads to inconvenient workarounds, like requesting photocopies from classmates with physical copies or ultimately purchasing a physical textbook.
These situations are currently being experienced by students in various courses.
Here's a summary of the issues:
- Increased potential for cheating with web-enabled devices.
- Difficulty in designing secure open-book exams.
- Printing restrictions imposed by textbook publishers.
- Disadvantage for students using digital textbooks.
Digital Textbooks and Science Majors: Potential for Confusion
A significant drawback observed with the shift towards digital textbooks is the potential for rendering issues. Not all specialized text, particularly within scientific disciplines, translates seamlessly to e-readers or tablets.
This isn't merely a hypothetical concern; it's a problem witnessed directly. A classmate utilizing a Kindle textbook experienced considerable difficulty understanding a mathematical formula due to incorrect symbol display.
Specifically, the Kindle rendered a delta triangle where the proper mathematical symbols should have appeared, leading to misinterpretation.
Incompatibility Examples in Academic Settings
Further illustrating this point, consider an example encountered in a Logic course, viewed on an Android tablet.
The screenshot demonstrates what appear to be squares, where curly braces were presumably intended. This misrepresentation introduces ambiguity and hinders comprehension.
Such inconsistencies can significantly impede a student’s ability to grasp complex concepts, especially in fields like mathematics and the sciences where precise notation is crucial.
The rendering engine's inability to accurately display specialized characters can create substantial learning obstacles.
The Disadvantages of Handwriting on Tablets with a Stylus
Many iPad and tablet users explore using a stylus as a potential replacement for traditional paper-based note-taking. This is a common expectation. I personally tested Bamboo’s Stylus with iPad and Autodesk’s SketchBook Pro, a leading drawing application available on the Android Market. Despite the quality of both devices, prolonged use revealed that writing with a stylus on a touchscreen doesn’t offer the same satisfying experience as using a pen and paper.
Achieving a stylus experience comparable to pen and paper may be unrealistic. However, the need for increased precision and additional pressure significantly detracts from the process. Consider the following example of my handwritten notes created with a stylus. Is the writing legible?

While certain portions of my handwriting remain recognizable, other sections resemble ancient hieroglyphs. If your experience with an iPad differs, please share your thoughts in the comments section. Despite repeated attempts, I haven’t been able to fully embrace stylus-based note-taking.

As illustrated in my notes from a Logic class, another challenge arises when prioritizing legibility. This focus inevitably slows down the note-taking process, potentially causing you to miss crucial information as the professor progresses and erases key points from the board.
Further complications occur when a tablet lacks palm rejection functionality, or necessitates writing in a large format with frequent zooming. Newer tablets, such as the Noteslate (currently unreleased), the HTC View, and the Lenovo Thinkpad tablet, demonstrate potential solutions to these issues. If you own any of these devices, please contribute your experiences in the comments.
Graphics Tablets vs. Stylus on Tablets
The experience with a graphics tablet, like a 12” Cintiq, could be substantially different. However, utilizing a graphics tablet requires transporting both your laptop and the tablet to class. You would also need to establish a workspace during each session, contingent upon sufficient desk space.
The Challenge of Maintaining Reading Progress in Digital Study Materials
Many individuals enjoy the convenience of synchronized reading positions across devices with leisure books using platforms like Kindle, Kobo, and Google Books. However, a significant gap exists when it comes to study materials.
Specifically, the inability to seamlessly sync reading progress in textbooks and slides – particularly PDFs and PowerPoint presentations frequently utilized by educators – presents a considerable challenge.
The Growing Problem with Digital Slides
As instructors increasingly adopt digital slideshows, the need for a reliable synchronization method becomes more pressing. Students are often forced to choose between printing materials, which defeats the goal of paper conservation, or repeatedly locating their last reading point.
This issue is a common source of frustration for students. While personal methods of tracking progress are possible, it seems illogical that e-books offer effortless syncing while digital learning resources lack this functionality.
Potential Solutions and Current Limitations
Tools like IbisReader offer a potential solution by enabling PDF document uploads and web-based reading across various devices.
However, until these platforms prioritize features like bookmarking and last-read page synchronization, their utility remains limited for students requiring precise tracking within their study materials.
Currently, IbisReader is better suited for casual reading rather than the demands of academic coursework.
The Advantages of Modern Devices
Despite certain drawbacks, the ownership of laptops, tablets, and smartphones presents numerous benefits.
Convenience and Portability
Tablets and smartphones, notably, function effectively as clocks. They are considerably lighter to carry than traditional textbooks and boast impressive battery performance.
Furthermore, these devices excel as e-readers – though perhaps not ideally suited for academic study – and can serve as personalized organizational tools.
A Balanced Perspective
It’s important to clarify that this discussion isn’t intended as a criticism of tablets or laptops. Rather, it represents a personal assessment of the current integration of personal technology within educational settings.
Solutions to the challenges presented by digital learning are possible, but the current implementation of digital textbooks and tablet-based learning often encounters difficulties.
Differing Viewpoints
The shift towards digitized schoolwork is often uneven, stemming from a divergence in perspectives. Some individuals remain committed to conventional methods, while others eagerly embrace the possibilities offered by modern technology.
We invite you to share your thoughts and opinions in the comment section below.
Image credits: karam Miri, Dmitry Lobanov, Digital Storm, Olaf Speier