15 Hilarious Yahoo Answers Questions - LOL Guaranteed!
The Daily Stream of Tech Queries
In my role as editor for MakeUseOf Answers, I encounter a significant volume of technology-focused inquiries on a daily basis. Due to the moderation process, potentially awkward or humorous questions are often refined. Consequently, the most outlandish questions are typically prevented from being published.
While this can be a loss from an entertainment perspective, it aligns with our primary goal: to contribute to a more informed global community.
Examples of Unusual Questions
To illustrate what I mean, consider exploring a compilation of 15 amusing questions sourced from Yahoo Answers. It's often surprising to contemplate how individuals navigate everyday life with such fundamental gaps in knowledge.
A Source of Amusement
Should you find yourself in need of a lighthearted distraction, these questions can certainly provide a workout for your facial and abdominal muscles!
They offer a unique form of entertainment, prompting both amusement and perhaps a slight sense of disbelief.
Really, the range of inquiries received is quite remarkable.
Addressing the Hypothetical: Preventing the Attack on Pearl Harbor
The question of preventing the attack on Pearl Harbor is, fundamentally, a thought experiment involving time travel. A direct response necessitates considering the tools required for such an undertaking.
The Requirements for Altering History
As playfully suggested, a practical solution – albeit fictional – would involve utilizing a Delorean automobile. This vehicle would need to be equipped with a Flux Capacitor.
Furthermore, achieving temporal displacement would demand a substantial power source. Specifically, 1.21 Gigawatts of electricity would be essential to initiate time travel.
It's important to recognize that this response is rooted in a science fiction context. The possibility of altering past events remains within the realm of hypothetical scenarios.
The initial query, while provocative, highlights the complexities of historical events and the impossibility of changing them without the means to manipulate time itself.
2. Question: Credit Card (Lodged) In Computer?
A Humorous Response: The suggested solution involves inverting the computer and applying a shaking motion.
Understanding the Scenario
The question pertains to a situation where a credit card has become physically stuck inside a computer. This is an unusual occurrence, but one that has prompted a lighthearted response.
The Proposed Solution
The answer offered is intentionally simplistic and facetious. It suggests that by turning the computer upside down and shaking it, the credit card might dislodge.
Why This is a "Smartass" Answer
The label "Smartass Answer" indicates the response is not intended as serious advice. It's a playful, somewhat sarcastic suggestion, likely intended to elicit amusement.
Potential Risks & Considerations
- Attempting this method could potentially cause further damage to the computer's internal components.
- It's unlikely to be an effective solution for a firmly lodged credit card.
- A more careful and methodical approach is generally recommended.
While humorous, this response highlights the importance of handling electronic devices with care and avoiding inserting foreign objects into them.
If You Pass Away, What Becomes of Your MySpace Profile?
A Humorous Response: The account is automatically removed. The premise is that upon death, a tiny microchip implanted in the brain triggers the deactivation of all online accounts.
It's believed that these chips are universally installed shortly after birth, affecting every individual.
Notably, this particular answer was selected as the most insightful by the original poster!
The question itself highlights a curious consideration regarding digital legacies.
The response, while facetious, touches upon the increasing permanence of our online presence.
It playfully suggests a technological failsafe for managing digital accounts after one’s demise.
The chosen answer’s popularity indicates a shared amusement with this somewhat morbid, yet relevant, thought experiment.
4. Question: Why Do Stupid People Breed?
The question posed is: why do individuals with lower cognitive abilities reproduce?
A facetious response to this inquiry is: did they desire companionship?
Understanding the Question's Nature
It’s important to recognize that the initial question is phrased in a highly provocative and insensitive manner. The terms used are derogatory and lack scientific basis.
The question implies a correlation between intelligence and reproductive rates, a concept that has been explored – and often misrepresented – in various fields.
Addressing the Underlying Concerns
While the phrasing is unacceptable, the question touches upon legitimate areas of inquiry within evolutionary biology and social science.
These areas include the heritability of intelligence, the factors influencing reproductive decisions, and the potential for genetic trends across generations.
The Flawed Premise
The core assumption of the question – that there is a direct link between intelligence and a propensity to reproduce – is largely unsupported by robust evidence.
Reproductive behavior is influenced by a complex interplay of biological, social, economic, and cultural factors.
A More Respectful Approach
A more appropriate way to frame the discussion would be to explore the factors that contribute to family size and reproductive choices across different populations.
This approach avoids stigmatizing individuals and focuses on understanding the multifaceted nature of human behavior.
The Importance of Nuance
It is crucial to avoid generalizations and recognize the diversity within any population group.
Intelligence is a complex trait with a wide range of variation, and reproductive decisions are highly personal and context-dependent.
Important Note: The original question's language is deeply problematic and should not be perpetuated. This response aims to address the underlying concerns in a respectful and scientifically informed manner.
5. Question: Does Consuming Large Amounts of Chocolate Affect the Flavor of Breast Milk?
A curious inquiry asks whether a mother’s significant chocolate intake would impart a chocolate flavor to her breast milk.
The Response
A rather unconventional response asserts that chocolate-flavored breast milk is exclusive to Black women.
Notably, this answer was selected as the most helpful by the original questioner.
I had not previously considered this, thank you for the information.
The individual expressed gratitude for this previously unknown insight.
This exchange highlights an instance of misinformation being accepted and shared online.
It’s important to note that a mother’s diet *can* subtly influence the taste of breast milk, but it doesn't relate to ethnicity.
While strong flavors like garlic or spices may be detectable, a significant amount of chocolate is generally needed to noticeably alter the milk’s taste.
Transforming a Computer Monitor into a Reflective Surface
The question of converting a computer monitor into a mirror is a surprisingly common one. It often arises from curiosity or a desire for a unique, albeit unconventional, application.
A Direct, Though Potentially Damaging, Solution
A straightforward, albeit somewhat facetious, response to this inquiry involves utilizing mirror-effect spray paint. This would entail applying the paint directly to the monitor's screen.
However, it’s crucial to understand that this method is likely to render the monitor unusable for its intended purpose. The spray paint would obscure the display and potentially damage the delicate internal components.
Therefore, while technically answering the question, this approach is strongly discouraged due to the irreversible consequences. It's a smartass answer that prioritizes a quick response over practicality or preservation of the device.
Consider the potential for permanent damage before attempting any modification to your computer monitor. Alternative solutions, though not directly converting the monitor *into* a mirror, might better serve your needs.
How to Attract YouTube Filming Opportunities
The inquiry regarding how to get YouTube to film you is a frequently encountered question. It has gained traction as a recurring theme on platforms like Yahoo! Answers.
Interestingly, this question often appears as a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction. The original posting of this query has since been removed from the source platform.
Understanding the Question's Context
The prevalence of this question suggests a desire for exposure on the YouTube platform. Many individuals aspire to be featured in YouTube content.
However, it's important to recognize that the question itself is often posed in a playful, even sarcastic manner. It's frequently used as a source of amusement online.
The "Smartass Answer" and its Significance
A common response to this question, as illustrated, is a simple "facepalm." This reaction highlights the perceived absurdity of directly requesting YouTube to film someone.
YouTube doesn't typically initiate filming requests from individuals. Content creation generally stems from independent creators or production companies.
The Deleted Original Question
The fact that the initial question on Yahoo! Answers was deleted indicates a possible moderation action. This could be due to repetitive posting or a violation of platform guidelines.
Despite its removal, the question continues to resurface, demonstrating its enduring appeal as a humorous topic.
8. Question: Why Are Fossilized Clam Shells Found On Mt. Everest?
The inquiry concerns the presence of fossilized clam shells at the high altitude of Mount Everest.
A Sarcastic Response: The answer is self-evident. To propose alternative explanations, like the geological process of seabed elevation through tectonic plate movement, would be considered unsubstantiated speculation.
Understanding the Geological Context
The discovery of marine fossils, including clam shells, on mountains like Everest presents a fascinating geological puzzle.
These fossils are not evidence of ancient oceans existing at those altitudes, but rather indicators of past geological events.
Tectonic Plate Subduction and Uplift
The primary explanation involves tectonic plate subduction. This is where one tectonic plate slides beneath another.
Over millions of years, this process can cause the uplift of ancient seabeds.
Consequently, areas that were once underwater become elevated to form mountain ranges.
Fossil Preservation
Fossilization is a rare occurrence, requiring specific conditions for preservation.
The clam shells found on Everest were likely embedded in sediment on the seabed before the uplift began.
The process of uplift then exposed these fossils at high altitudes.
Rejecting Alternative Explanations
The initial response dismisses alternative explanations as "hocus-pocus and superstition."
However, it’s important to understand that geological explanations are based on scientific evidence and rigorous testing.
These explanations are not based on belief, but on observable phenomena and established principles.
Key Takeaways
- The presence of clam shells on Everest is due to geological uplift.
- This uplift occurred through tectonic plate subduction.
- Fossils provide evidence of past environments.
Therefore, the seemingly bizarre discovery is a testament to the powerful forces that shape our planet over vast timescales.
9. Question: What Is The Country Of Canada All About?
Smartass Answer: It appears the state of education within the United States is a significant concern.
The query regarding Canada highlights a potential gap in geographical and political understanding among some individuals.
Understanding Canada
Canada is a North American nation defined by its vast landscapes and multiculturalism.
It is the world’s second-largest country by total area, encompassing diverse terrains from coast to coast.
- Geography: Features include towering mountains, expansive prairies, and arctic tundra.
- Population: Approximately 38 million people reside within its borders.
- Government: Canada operates as a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy.
The country shares the longest land border with the United States, fostering a complex and significant relationship.
Canada’s economy is heavily reliant on its abundant natural resources, including oil, gas, and minerals.
Cultural Aspects
Canada is renowned for its commitment to multiculturalism and inclusivity.
Its official languages are English and French, reflecting its historical ties to both Britain and France.
Major cities like Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver are hubs of cultural diversity.
Key Features: The nation is also known for its universal healthcare system and high quality of life.
The initial response to the question, while sarcastic, underscores a perceived deficiency in basic knowledge.
10. Question: Why Choose 'God' When Godzilla Deserves Worship?
A Direct Response: My preference lies in venerating entities grounded in reality, rather than fictional creations, and therefore I worship God.
This inquiry evokes parallels with the concept of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. As articulated by its originator, Bobby Henderson:
The Church of the FSM, boasting a substantial following of millions, and potentially thousands, of dedicated believers, is broadly recognized as a genuine religion, even among those who oppose it—primarily fundamentalist Christians, who concede that our deity possesses greater metaphorical significance.
The Core of the Question
The original question playfully challenges conventional religious belief. It highlights a potential absurdity in choosing a traditional deity over a powerful, iconic figure from popular culture.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster Analogy
The comparison to the Flying Spaghetti Monster is apt. Both scenarios question the basis of faith and the criteria used to determine what is worthy of worship.
Henderson's Perspective
Bobby Henderson’s statement underscores the subjective nature of religious belief. He points out that acceptance often hinges on perceived symbolic power, even if the foundation is unconventional.
The statement also subtly critiques fundamentalist viewpoints, suggesting a competitive element in the assertion of religious dominance.
Understanding the Underlying Argument
The question isn't necessarily advocating for Godzilla worship. Instead, it serves as a thought experiment. It prompts consideration of what qualities make a being worthy of reverence.
Ultimately, the response emphasizes a personal preference for grounding faith in tangible reality, while acknowledging the inherent subjectivity of religious belief.