Why I Still Use Windows 7 - A Windows 8 Review
A Personal Perspective on Windows 8
The question of whether to upgrade to Windows 8 has been a frequent topic here at How-To Geek, with numerous articles published on the subject. Despite contributing to many of these pieces, I personally continue to utilize Windows 7 on my primary computer.
This viewpoint represents a single technology enthusiast’s assessment. My engagement with Windows 8 extends back considerably, predating its public release.
Early Access and Initial Impressions
Approximately a year has passed since I began authoring articles concerning Windows 8, leveraging access to a prerelease version here on How-To Geek. This extended period of familiarity has shaped my perspective.
Differing Experiences
Mark has previously shared his journey of embracing Windows 8, detailing how his initial reservations evolved into appreciation. I, however, offer a contrasting account.
Despite a concerted effort to adapt and find value in the new operating system, I have been unable to fully integrate Windows 8 into my workflow.
Continued Preference for Windows 7
While acknowledging the advancements within Windows 8, my personal preference remains with the established functionality and interface of Windows 7.
This is not to diminish the merits of Windows 8 for others, but rather to illustrate that individual experiences and requirements can significantly influence operating system preference.
The Paradox of Progress: Why Newer Doesn’t Always Mean Superior
A common misconception exists regarding software updates. Despite Bill Gates’ preference for the latest Windows iteration, the assertion that “higher is better” doesn’t consistently hold true within the Windows operating system landscape. Past experiences demonstrate that newer versions aren't automatically improvements.
For instance, Windows Me was plagued by frequent system crashes, prompting many users, including myself, to remain with the more reliable Windows 98. Similarly, Windows Vista suffered from slow network transfer speeds, leading a large number of individuals to continue using Windows XP. Consequently, the arrival of each new Windows version necessitates careful consideration.
It’s important to acknowledge the advancements made with each release. Windows 8, unlike its predecessors, proved to be remarkably stable and fast. However, its shortcomings weren’t related to technical execution, but rather to its fundamental design philosophy.
Acknowledging Windows 8’s Strengths
Windows 8 distinguished itself from earlier problematic releases. Both Windows Me and Vista were hampered by significant issues concerning stability and overall performance. In contrast, Windows 8 delivered a consistently stable and speedy user experience.
The core issue with Windows 8 wasn’t a failure of engineering, but a divergence in user interface vision. Its design choices proved controversial, rather than technical limitations.
Despite its Strengths, Windows 8 Remains a Challenging Upgrade
Having thoroughly examined the numerous desktop features and security enhancements present in Windows 8, a reluctance to upgrade from my non-touch laptop persists. While the merits of upgrading to Windows 8 have been previously acknowledged, several factors contribute to a continued preference for the existing system.
- Mandatory Metro Boot Experience – Microsoft firmly intended Windows tablet users to operate exclusively within the Metro interface, though this goal proved unsuccessful. However, they seemingly believe desktop users should also be denied the option of directly booting to the traditional desktop environment. This preference clashes with a desire to primarily work within the desktop, rather than consume content via the Modern interface. Though Start menu replacements offer a workaround, they introduce a noticeable delay during login. Microsoft actively prevented immediate desktop booting following user feedback during preview releases.
- Cognitive Load Imposed by the Start Screen – The Start screen necessitates a shift in focus, potentially disrupting workflow and attention to other tasks. Experts in usability have identified the dual interfaces as creating a significant “cognitive burden.” Attempting to mitigate this by pinning all frequently used applications to the taskbar results in a cluttered taskbar for those who utilize a diverse range of software. Installing a third-party Start menu, such as the highly-regarded Start8, is a viable solution, but it raises the question of whether this signals to Microsoft a need for improvements in Windows 8 itself, rather than simply patching its shortcomings.
- Lack of Consolidated Search Functionality – Locating programs or files in Windows 7 is a streamlined process. Simply pressing the Windows key, typing a portion of the name or content, and viewing matching results is intuitive. Pressing Enter immediately launches the selected item. Windows 8 introduces an additional step. The default search confines itself to installed applications, requiring a separate click on “Settings” or “Files” for broader searches. Certain settings are found under “Apps,” others under “Settings,” and some under both. As a technical writer, this necessitates detailing an extra step when guiding users through search procedures. Similar to other elements of the Modern interface, the search experience occupies the full screen while displaying reduced content.
- The Windows Store: An Unrealized Potential – Initial excitement surrounded the prospect of a centralized app store with Windows 8. Having experience with Linux distributions, the convenience of a unified software installation and update tool was well understood. However, Microsoft restricted the Windows Store to Modern apps, excluding desktop applications. While a limited selection of desktop apps are listed, they merely provide download links, lacking integrated installation, updates, or device synchronization. The Windows Store presented a significant upgrade incentive, but its utility on a desktop is minimal, and its value on tablets is also limited.
- Modern Interface Intrusion on the Desktop – Even with a Start menu installed and desktop booting enabled, elements of the Modern interface persist. The tablet-oriented lock screen appears upon locking the computer, requiring modification through group policy or the registry editor to disable. Furthermore, the app switcher and charms activate when the cursor approaches the screen's edge, causing potential distractions. These features can also be disabled. However, inconsistencies remain. Clicking the Wi-Fi icon reveals a large, Modern-style sidebar for network selection, obscuring the system tray. Similarly, the Sound and Battery icons display standard pop-up dialogs, creating an inconsistent user experience. Even actions like inserting media or connecting a device trigger Modern-style dialogs. Default file associations may also need adjustment to prevent full-screen Modern interface launches when opening images, music, videos, or PDFs.
Is the Future of PC Computing Defined by the Modern Interface?
There's speculation among some Windows enthusiasts that Microsoft intends to phase out the traditional desktop environment with future Windows versions, fully embracing the Modern interface. While the Modern interface may prove beneficial for users primarily engaged in browsing, social media, and media playback, this prospect is concerning for those who rely on their computers for professional work.
The reasons for my continued preference for a traditional computing experience, despite utilizing Windows 8, will be outlined below.
- Limitations in Multitasking – A significant portion of my workflow involves simultaneously viewing a webpage and a writing application. This functionality is severely restricted within the Modern interface. Although side-by-side app viewing is possible, one application is relegated to a minimal screen portion. The Aero Snap feature, a cornerstone of Windows 7’s productivity, contrasts sharply with the Windows 8 Snap feature, which appears geared towards casual multitasking rather than detailed content comparison.
- Suboptimal High-Resolution Display Support – My current laptop features a 17” display with a 1920x1080 resolution. However, Windows 8’s Modern applications do not effectively utilize this screen space. Running multiple applications concurrently is problematic. The operating system feels tailored for smaller, 1366x768, 13” touchscreen devices.
- Concerns Regarding Ecosystem Lock-In – The Modern interface steers users towards a heavily integrated Microsoft ecosystem, emphasizing services like Bing, SkyDrive, and Xbox Live. Access to mobile games is channeled through the Windows Store, music purchases are directed to Xbox Music, and video rentals originate from Xbox Video. Furthermore, integration with non-Microsoft calendars, such as Google Calendar, has been removed. The Video application prioritizes sales over playback of locally stored files. Is this the experience most Windows users desire? I prefer the freedom to select services like Google, Steam, Rdio, and Netflix based on their individual strengths, rather than being constrained by a single vendor’s offerings. Many popular applications, including iTunes, lack a Modern Windows 8 counterpart.
- Restrictions of a Closed Platform – The Modern interface limits software installation to applications approved by Microsoft. While sideloading is available, it’s primarily restricted to developers and corporate environments. Microsoft should not dictate which software users can execute on their systems. The experience with Apple’s iOS serves as a cautionary tale – applications banned due to content, delays in competitor integration, and limitations on web browser engines. Consider the implications of being confined to Internet Explorer 6 as the sole browser on Windows XP. (Moreover, circumventing these restrictions to install unapproved software can be legally problematic.)
- Deficiencies in the Windows Store and its Applications – Even if the Modern interface were flawless, the quality of the Windows Store and its applications remains a significant drawback. While the number of available apps has increased, quality surpasses quantity. My computer requires robust software, not simplistic tools like basic tip calculators.
The Continued Appeal of Windows 7
Following an attempt to adapt to Windows 8 as a desktop operating system, I reverted to Windows 7. The transition provided an immediate sense of utilizing a platform intuitively designed for my computing habits.
The system intelligently recognizes the absence of a touch screen and refrains from simulating its presence. Consistent dialog boxes are presented on the desktop, and there's a lack of unsolicited promotion of Microsoft services. This results in a significantly more user-friendly desktop experience.
Unlike Windows 8, which felt fragmented – akin to a “Jekyll and Hyde” duality – Windows 7 doesn’t necessitate extensive customization to disable unwanted features or accommodate those that cannot be altered.
What advantages are potentially forfeited by remaining with Windows 7? While the desktop environment might exhibit slightly improved responsiveness, this difference is imperceptible with a Core i7 processor.
Boot times are faster in newer versions, however, I routinely utilize sleep or hibernation modes when the computer is not actively in use. Gaming performance represents the primary area where a performance increase could be compelling.
However, benchmarks indicate that gaming performance remains largely comparable between the operating systems. File copying speeds have been substantially enhanced, but my file-copying needs are minimal, and TeraCopy effectively addresses those requirements.
The updated Task Manager is a welcome addition, yet I continue to favor the capabilities of Process Explorer.
A desktop-exclusive edition of Windows 8 would be a highly desirable option. Nevertheless, for my typical desktop usage, Windows 8 introduces more obstacles than enhancements to my workflow.
Windows 7 remains a robust and reliable operating system, and its continued adoption by businesses is a testament to its value. It has effectively become the modern equivalent of Windows XP.
Considering a Windows 8 Installation?
For those deeply involved in the technology sector, familiarity with Windows 8 and its functionalities is often essential. If you anticipate providing support for Windows 8 users, proactively installing and understanding the operating system is a prudent step. Having extensively covered Windows 8 through numerous articles and utilized it intermittently over the past year, I've developed a comprehensive understanding of its capabilities.
However, my experience has led me to a conclusion: I don't particularly favor it. The experience might be more appealing with a touch-screen interface or a convertible device offering both laptop and tablet functionalities.
The Potential of Convertible Devices
Convertible devices present a compelling proposition, yet the Modern UI environment falls short in certain aspects. It lacks the breadth of applications available on the iPad and the unrestricted access to software outside of curated app stores, a feature offered by Android.
While the Modern environment offers a unique approach, it doesn't quite match the app ecosystem of its competitors.
A Critical Assessment of Windows 8
Microsoft should prioritize user feedback. The notion that desktop personal computers are becoming obsolete is inaccurate. A significant user base continues to rely on computers for professional tasks, and the inclusion of the Modern interface in Windows Server demonstrates a potential disconnect from these needs.
It’s been reported that Windows Blue aims to address several of these concerns. Improvements are expected, including the ability to snap Modern applications in a 50/50 split-screen view, support for more concurrent Modern apps on high-resolution displays, and the restoration of a comprehensive search function.
These represent positive developments, but inherent limitations within the Modern interface’s architecture prevent it from achieving the same level of adaptability as the traditional desktop environment for advanced users.
Persistent Concerns
Despite ongoing negative feedback received even during the public testing phases of Windows 8, the core issues voiced by desktop users remain unresolved. This lack of responsiveness is a significant point of contention.
While personal resistance to change at the age of 26 might be a factor, it’s unlikely to be the sole reason for the widespread dissatisfaction. Change itself isn't automatically beneficial; it must offer genuine improvements.
The lukewarm reception of Windows 8, evidenced by lower adoption rates, the absence of long queues at launch, and less favorable media coverage, suggests a broader sentiment mirroring these concerns, contrasting sharply with the positive response to previous iterations like Windows 7.
Readers are encouraged to share their personal experiences and perspectives. A considerable portion of the audience has expressed similar frustrations with Windows 8, as observed in previous commentary.
Conversely, some readers and writers within our community have embraced Windows 8. Continued coverage of Windows 8 will be provided, but it will be confined to a virtual machine until substantial improvements are implemented.
Further Discussion: The ongoing debate highlights the importance of balancing innovation with user needs.
Image source: A Windows Me screenshot sourced from Wikipedia.
Related Posts
Touchscreen on Windows PC: Do You Need It?
Find Lost Windows or Office Product Keys - Easy Guide
Windows 10 Setup: Express vs. Custom - What's the Difference?
Manage Accessibility Features in Windows 10 - A Comprehensive Guide
Windows 10 Start Menu: A Comprehensive Guide
