Extra Crunch Roundup: Startups, Relocation & Tech Myths

The Challenge of Launching a SaaS Startup in a Competitive Market

While the present moment might appear opportune for initiating a SaaS startup, the market is notably saturated with sophisticated applications. These applications frequently advertise “exceptionally quick and remarkably intuitive” user experiences, as highlighted by John Chen, a seed-stage investor at Fika Ventures.

The vast majority of SaaS startups ultimately encounter failure. However, this is rarely attributable to ineffective marketing strategies or service interruptions. Chen identifies the primary cause as “the misconception of effortless onboarding.”

The Reality of Enterprise Adoption

Despite widespread claims of user-friendliness, businesses invariably require their clientele to transition away from established tools. This necessitates learning a new system and adapting to different workflows.

Chen draws a parallel to fitness regimens, observing that while individuals experience satisfaction post-exercise, initiating and sustaining effort demands significant energy expenditure.

Access to complete Extra Crunch articles is exclusive to members.
Utilize the discount code ECFriday for a 20% reduction on one- or two-year subscriptions.

Incentivizing User Engagement

Rather than expecting customers to proactively invest effort, Chen proposes that SaaS startups draw inspiration from the principles of cryptocurrency. The goal should be to discover methods for “motivating users to undertake the essential tasks for a positive experience.”

A key question arises: how can companies effectively motivate users to dedicate the necessary time and energy to achieve an ideal customer experience?

Chen asserts that in a landscape abundant with options, the most limited resource isn't content, tools, or shortcuts. Instead, “attention” is the critical constraint.

Upcoming Holiday Observance

Please note that TechCrunch will be closed on Monday, May 31, in recognition of Memorial Day. We wish you a peaceful and restorative weekend!

Walter Thompson
Senior Editor, TechCrunch
@yourprotagonist

Debunking Common Misconceptions About Securing Initial Funding

The evolution of startups and venture capital has transformed fundraising. It’s shifted from a traditionally formal process centered in locations like Sand Hill Road to a more accessible method occurring through platforms like Twitter and Zoom.

Obtaining funding may not necessitate a physical journey to California anymore. However, access can sometimes hinge on receiving an invitation to exclusive, private audio-based platforms.

Despite this changing landscape, experienced founders – predominantly male and white – continue to possess a significant advantage in the fundraising arena.

This increasing intricacy in fundraising presents a pivotal moment. It has the potential to either broaden access to capital or further concentrate it within established networks.

While venture capital remains a highly visible goal, the proliferation of new fund managers means initial funding can be assembled from diverse sources.

Exploring Diverse Funding Avenues

The financing options available to startups appear extensive. These include syndicates, public crowdfunding, traditional VC firms, accelerators, debt financing, rolling funds, and, notably, bootstrapping for companies achieving profitability.

A first check doesn’t necessarily need to come from a single source anymore. It can be built up incrementally.

Why Doximity’s IPO Filing Sheds Light on Rising Healthcare Industry Exits

The telehealth company, Doximity, submitted its S-1 filing for an initial public offering today. A key observation is that the company hasn’t sought additional funding since 2014.

In 2014, Doximity secured approximately $82 million in funding, resulting in a company valuation of $355 million, according to PitchBook’s data.

What allowed Doximity to operate for an extended period without further fundraising? The answer lies in its consistent generation of substantial cash flow and profitability.

It appears that facilitating communications within the healthtech sector can be a highly profitable business model.

The Significance of Doximity’s Financial Performance

Doximity’s success demonstrates a pathway for healthtech companies to achieve sustainability and independence. Many startups rely on continuous funding rounds.

The company’s ability to thrive without external investment is likely contributing to the recent increase in exits observed within the healthcare technology landscape.

Profitability is becoming an increasingly important metric for investors, and Doximity’s example highlights the value of a self-sustaining business.

Implications for the Healthtech Market

The current market conditions are favoring companies that can demonstrate strong financial performance. This trend is particularly noticeable in the healthtech sector.

We are seeing a shift in investor focus from growth at all costs to sustainable, profitable businesses. Doximity’s story exemplifies this change.

This shift may lead to more companies pursuing exit strategies, such as IPOs or acquisitions, as they seek to realize the value of their businesses.

Analyzing Vimeo’s Performance: Insights into the Online Video Landscape

The separation of the Vimeo platform from IAC was finalized this week. Consequently, the newly independent company is now publicly traded with the stock symbol ‘VMEO’.

Should you have overlooked the announcement regarding IAC’s divestiture of its video division, that is understandable. The news didn’t garner widespread attention.

However, with the company now operating independently and its financial records accessible, alongside the recent disclosure of YouTube’s financial results by Alphabet, a review of Vimeo’s standing is warranted.

Vimeo’s Financial Overview

In 2020, Vimeo generated $325 million in revenue. This represents an increase of 21% compared to the previous year.

The company reported an adjusted EBITDA of $66.8 million, indicating profitability. This figure demonstrates a solid margin for a company in the competitive online video space.

Subscriber Base and Revenue Streams

As of the end of 2020, Vimeo boasted approximately 1.4 million subscribers. These subscribers are divided into different tiers, each offering varying levels of features and storage.

Subscription revenue constitutes the primary source of income for Vimeo. However, the company is also actively expanding its revenue streams through services like stock footage and live event streaming.

Comparing Vimeo to YouTube

While YouTube dominates the online video market in terms of sheer scale, Vimeo differentiates itself through its focus on professional creators.

YouTube’s revenue in 2020 reached $19.8 billion, significantly exceeding Vimeo’s. This disparity highlights the vast difference in user base and advertising revenue between the two platforms.

Key Takeaways and Future Outlook

Vimeo’s successful spin-off and independent trading status mark a significant milestone for the company.

The platform’s growth in revenue and subscribers demonstrates its appeal to a specific niche of video creators. Continued investment in creator tools and diversified revenue streams will be crucial for sustained success.

• Vimeo generated $325 million in revenue in 2020.
• The company has approximately 1.4 million subscribers.
• Subscription services are Vimeo’s main source of revenue.
• YouTube’s 2020 revenue was $19.8 billion.

Flywire's IPO Indicates a Potential Rebound in the Public Offering Market

Flywire’s recent initial public offering is significant not only financially, but also because it represents an exit for a company based in Boston. This is a welcome change from the concentration of IPOs in New York and San Francisco.

The success of this offering is particularly encouraging as it may signal a shift in the IPO landscape. It’s positive to observe other metropolitan areas achieving success in this arena.

A Benchmark for the IPO Market

Beyond the specifics of Flywire, this IPO serves as a valuable indicator of the overall health of the public market. The current year and the preceding one are anticipated to be crucial periods for exits.

A substantial portion of venture capital fund returns are dependent on the successful public debuts of startups and unicorn companies. These IPOs are vital for investors.

• Many venture capital funds are counting on these public offerings.
• The performance of these companies will directly impact fund returns.

The timing of Flywire’s IPO is noteworthy, potentially suggesting that the recent slowdown in initial public offerings is easing. This could open the door for more companies to access public capital.

Navigating Immigration for Rapid Tech Talent Acquisition

Dear Sophie,

As a recruiter specializing in the tech startup sector, you’re likely facing intense pressure to onboard talent quickly given the current investment climate.

Your inquiry focuses on expedited visa options for international professionals. Let's examine strategies to facilitate swift hiring.

Visa Options for Expedited Hiring

Several visa categories can provide relatively fast pathways for skilled workers. The optimal choice depends heavily on the individual’s qualifications and the startup’s specific needs.

• H-1B Visa: While subject to an annual lottery, the H-1B remains a popular option for those with specialized knowledge.
• L-1A/L-1B Visas: These visas are suitable for intra-company transferees, allowing companies to move established employees to the U.S.
• O-1 Visa: Reserved for individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement, the O-1 visa offers a faster processing time than many other options.
• TN Visa: Available to Canadian and Mexican citizens under the USMCA agreement, the TN visa provides a streamlined process for qualifying professionals.

Unique Immigration Strategies to Consider

Beyond standard visa applications, several proactive strategies can accelerate the hiring process.

• Visa Sponsorship Packages: Offering a comprehensive visa sponsorship package can attract top talent. This demonstrates commitment and simplifies the process for candidates.
• Proactive PERM Labor Certification: Initiating the PERM labor certification process early, even before a specific position is open, can save valuable time later.
• Remote Work Considerations: Explore the possibility of remote work arrangements, particularly for roles that don't require a physical presence in the U.S.
• Strategic Use of Premium Processing: When available, utilizing premium processing for eligible visa types can significantly reduce processing times.

Careful planning and a proactive approach are essential for navigating the complexities of U.S. immigration. Consulting with experienced immigration counsel is highly recommended.

— Sophie

7 Key Considerations Before Moving Your Startup to Florida

For years, cities such as Austin, Pittsburgh, and Miami have been attracting both skilled professionals and capital from Silicon Valley.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly intensified this migration pattern.

A notable influx of investors and founders have recently chosen Miami as their new base, pointing to its advantageous business environment and appealing lifestyle.

Exploring alternative locations is prudent, but entrepreneurs should thoroughly evaluate several factors before committing to a relocation to Florida – or any up-and-coming technology center.

Essential Questions for Entrepreneurs

Careful planning is crucial for a successful relocation. Here are seven questions to guide your decision-making process.

• Is your target market located in Florida? Relocating makes sense if your customer base is present in the new location.
• Can you find the talent you need? Assess the availability of skilled workers with the specific expertise your startup requires.
• What is the cost of living compared to your current location? Consider housing, salaries, and everyday expenses.
• How will the move impact your existing investors? Maintain open communication and address any concerns they may have.
• What incentives are available? Florida offers various programs to attract businesses; investigate potential benefits.
• Are you prepared for the cultural shift? Each region has its own unique culture; understand how it might affect your team.
• What is the long-term vision for your company in Florida? Develop a clear strategy for growth and sustainability.

A well-considered response to each of these questions will help determine if a move to Florida is the right choice for your startup.

Thorough due diligence is paramount to ensuring a smooth transition and maximizing the potential benefits of a new location.

Samir Vasavada, CEO of Vise, and Shaun Maguire of Sequoia Discuss the Nuances of Pitching

Vise’s trajectory has been remarkably swift, evolving from a launch on the Disrupt Battlefield to achieving unicorn status within a few years. The company’s co-founders, Samir Vasavada and Runik Mehrotra, initially connected with Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire at a post-event gathering.

Maguire subsequently spearheaded both the seed and Series A funding rounds, with Sequoia taking the lead in the Series B investment.

Recently, Vise secured a Series C funding round of $65 million, resulting in a post-money valuation of $1 billion.

A conversation was held with both Vasavada and Maguire to explore Vise’s initial fundraising journey.

Insights into Effective Fundraising

The discussion centered on the lessons Vasavada has gleaned regarding the delivery of compelling fundraising pitches.

Furthermore, Maguire shared his perspective on what specifically distinguished Vise’s pitch and product during the evaluation process.

Key areas of focus included the elements that resonated most strongly with investors.

• Understanding investor priorities is crucial.
• A clear and concise pitch is essential.
• Demonstrating product-market fit is paramount.

Shaun Maguire emphasized the importance of a founder’s ability to articulate a vision.

Samir Vasavada highlighted the need for adaptability throughout the fundraising process.

The conversation provided valuable insights into the dynamics between startups and venture capitalists.

The Early Stages of Vise’s Funding

The initial meetings with Sequoia were focused on establishing a rapport and building trust.

Vasavada and Mehrotra were prepared to answer detailed questions about their business model and market opportunity.

Maguire’s decision to invest was based on a combination of factors, including the team’s expertise and the potential for significant growth.

The early funding rounds were instrumental in enabling Vise to scale its operations and expand its product offerings.

Acorns’ Public Listing Reveals a Consumer Fintech Model with Recurring Revenue

A new day brings another unicorn to the public market.

Thursday marked the public offering of Acorns, a consumer fintech platform integrating saving and investment features within a freemium framework.

Acorns is positioned within the broader trend of increased savings and investment activity observed over the past four to five quarters.

This surge in activity was largely driven by consumers responding to the economic shifts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading them to prioritize cash reserves and equity investments.

While this trend is well-established, a detailed understanding of the financial dynamics of consumer fintech companies that experienced accelerated growth during the pandemic has been lacking.

The decision by Acorns to go public through a SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) – details to follow – now provides that clarity.

Understanding Acorns’ Business Model

Acorns’ revenue model is notably reliant on subscriptions, exhibiting characteristics similar to a SaaS (Software as a Service) business.

This contrasts with many other fintech companies that primarily generate revenue through transaction fees or interchange.

The company’s core offering revolves around automatically investing spare change from everyday purchases, alongside other investment and savings tools.

• Founders Note: Acorns was founded in 2014.
• Key Feature: Round-Ups, automatically investing spare change.
• Target Audience: Primarily younger, first-time investors.

This approach fosters customer loyalty and generates predictable, recurring income streams.

The shift towards a subscription-based model is a significant development in the consumer fintech space.

It allows Acorns to focus on long-term customer relationships rather than solely relying on transactional revenue.

SPAC Listing Details

Acorns merged with Pioneer Acquisition Corp (PACD) to become publicly traded on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol OAKS.

The transaction valued Acorns at approximately $2.2 billion.

Going public via a SPAC offered Acorns a faster and more streamlined path to the public markets compared to a traditional IPO (Initial Public Offering).

This method has become increasingly popular among fintech companies seeking to raise capital and increase their visibility.

Implications for the Fintech Landscape

Acorns’ listing provides valuable insights into the financial performance and growth potential of consumer fintech businesses.

The company’s success demonstrates the viability of a subscription-based model in this sector.

It also highlights the growing demand for accessible and user-friendly investment tools, particularly among younger demographics.

The Detrimental Impact of Inadequate Onboarding on New Hires

The shift towards hybrid work models necessitates a reevaluation of traditional onboarding practices. A brief introductory call, a welcome package, and a casual team lunch are no longer sufficient to effectively integrate new employees.

Numerous organizations have successfully adapted their candidate interview and selection procedures for remote settings. However, comparatively few have invested in updating their “pre-boarding” and onboarding processes to align with the realities of the modern, hybrid workplace.

Leveraging the initial excitement and motivation of new hires from the moment of offer acceptance, rather than waiting until their first day, is crucial. Positive initial experiences significantly influence a candidate’s long-term commitment to the organization.

Why Traditional Onboarding Falls Short

Many employers continue to employ outdated methods for welcoming new team members, despite the substantial changes in the work landscape. This disconnect can lead to disengagement and ultimately, turnover.

Failing to proactively engage candidates during the period between offer acceptance and their start date represents a missed opportunity. This pre-boarding phase is vital for building rapport and setting expectations.

Key Considerations for Modern Onboarding

• Proactive Communication: Maintain consistent contact with new hires, providing updates and answering questions.
• Digital Resources: Offer access to essential documents and training materials online.
• Virtual Introductions: Facilitate virtual meetings with team members and key stakeholders.
• Clear Expectations: Outline roles, responsibilities, and performance goals from the outset.

Investing in a robust onboarding program is not merely a matter of courtesy; it’s a strategic imperative. Effective onboarding directly impacts employee retention and overall organizational success.